Abstract:Background
Refugees and asylum seekers are frequently exposed to violence, human rights violations and unstable living conditions before, during, and after their displacement. Elevated prevalence rates of psychiatric disorders in forcibly displaced persons are well documented. However, less is known about other problems related to common refugee experiences, such as embitterment, moral injury, and diminished self-efficacy, and how they are related to trauma exposure and post-migration living di… Show more
“…Participants received a $60 USD gift card for their time and travel on completion of the interview, as has been done previously in our own studies and in multiple qualitative studies with refugees and asylum seekers in highincome countries. [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim. Identifying information was removed from each transcript and then saved on a secure server.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 37 39 40 All participants were provided a gift card to remove any monetary barriers to participation related to missing work obligations and incurring expenses while travelling to the interview site. [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] This compensation mechanism could have introduced participation bias. Thus, the characteristics of participants may differ from those who chose not to participate (e.g., age, employment).…”
ObjectivesTo examine health behaviours of refugees and asylum seekers, in relation to their knowledge of public benefits and legal rights.DesignQualitative study, utilising an open-ended, semi-structured interview guide to ensure information-rich data collection. Thematic content was analysed using qualitative research software.SettingParticipants were drawn from the Weill Cornell Center for Human Rights (WCCHR) in New York City, a single-center, human rights clinic with a globally representative patient population. All interviews were conducted at the Weill Cornell Medicine Clinical and Translational Science Center, a multidisciplinary space within an urban academic medical center.ParticipantsTwenty-four refugees and asylum seekers currently living in the greater New York City area. Eligible participants were 18 years of age or older and had previously sought services from the WCCHR. The recruitment rate was 55%.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThemes and concepts in participants’ health, knowledge, perceptions of and experiences with accessing healthcare and public benefits programmes.ResultsTwenty-four participants represented 18 countries of origin and 11 primary languages. Several impediments to accessing healthcare and public benefits were identified, including pragmatic barriers (such as prohibitive costs or lack of insurance), knowledge gaps and mistrust of healthcare systems.ConclusionsThere is low health engagement by refugees and asylum seekers, as a result of multiple, complex factors impeding the ability of refugee and asylum seekers to access healthcare and other public benefits for which they are eligible—with resultant detrimental health effects. However, there is an opportunity to utilise novel approaches, such as digital technologies, to communicate relevant information regarding legal rights and public benefits to advance the health of vulnerable individuals such as refugees and asylum seekers.
“…Participants received a $60 USD gift card for their time and travel on completion of the interview, as has been done previously in our own studies and in multiple qualitative studies with refugees and asylum seekers in highincome countries. [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim. Identifying information was removed from each transcript and then saved on a secure server.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 37 39 40 All participants were provided a gift card to remove any monetary barriers to participation related to missing work obligations and incurring expenses while travelling to the interview site. [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] This compensation mechanism could have introduced participation bias. Thus, the characteristics of participants may differ from those who chose not to participate (e.g., age, employment).…”
ObjectivesTo examine health behaviours of refugees and asylum seekers, in relation to their knowledge of public benefits and legal rights.DesignQualitative study, utilising an open-ended, semi-structured interview guide to ensure information-rich data collection. Thematic content was analysed using qualitative research software.SettingParticipants were drawn from the Weill Cornell Center for Human Rights (WCCHR) in New York City, a single-center, human rights clinic with a globally representative patient population. All interviews were conducted at the Weill Cornell Medicine Clinical and Translational Science Center, a multidisciplinary space within an urban academic medical center.ParticipantsTwenty-four refugees and asylum seekers currently living in the greater New York City area. Eligible participants were 18 years of age or older and had previously sought services from the WCCHR. The recruitment rate was 55%.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThemes and concepts in participants’ health, knowledge, perceptions of and experiences with accessing healthcare and public benefits programmes.ResultsTwenty-four participants represented 18 countries of origin and 11 primary languages. Several impediments to accessing healthcare and public benefits were identified, including pragmatic barriers (such as prohibitive costs or lack of insurance), knowledge gaps and mistrust of healthcare systems.ConclusionsThere is low health engagement by refugees and asylum seekers, as a result of multiple, complex factors impeding the ability of refugee and asylum seekers to access healthcare and other public benefits for which they are eligible—with resultant detrimental health effects. However, there is an opportunity to utilise novel approaches, such as digital technologies, to communicate relevant information regarding legal rights and public benefits to advance the health of vulnerable individuals such as refugees and asylum seekers.
“…As injustice, humiliation, breach of trust are frequent events and may occur in any life domain where people interact, embitterment may theoretically occur in all age groups, professions, persons of different social backgrounds, religion, or culture. Stressful events or potential sources of embitterment can be very diverse and occur in any domain of life [2,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Until now, research on embitterment was mainly done in groups exposed to specific conditions, such as people with chronic illness, or in work settings: in patients with mental disorders, about one third reported increased embitterment scores [4], aggressive phantasies in 3.2% [11].…”
Section: Embitterment As a Specific Affect And Potential Mental Healt...mentioning
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Embitterment may occur after stressful but normal life events, such as job loss, divorce, or unjust events. Embitterment is a normal affect, but it may become clinically relevant in case it becomes very strong and long-lasting, and impairs daily functioning. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> Until now, no epidemiological data on the frequency of high embitterment in the general population have been available. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A national representative survey of 2,531 people was carried out in Germany in 2019. The participants gave ratings for their embitterment due to perceived events (Posttraumatic Embitterment Scale), their psychological capacity profile (Mini-ICF-APP-S), sick leave duration, and sociodemographics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> About 11.7% of the investigated representative population report moderate embitterment, and another 3.8% high embitterment. Embitterment was only low correlated with other psychopathology, here work anxiety (<i>r</i> = 0.281**). There are no differences between embittered and nonembittered in respect to age, sex, household members, and professional distribution. Those with the highest embitterment have been unemployed more often and have lower income. At least 7.2% of those with high embitterment have a severe psychological capacity impairment and are in need of support by thirds to fulfill daily duties. In 55% of the 802 who reported a stressful event, injustice by an important person has been reported. Injustice by an institution (14%) or societal injustice (12%) was least often reported as a relevant stressful event. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Physicians, therapists, and public health must be aware of embitterment as a specific mental health problem which occurs frequently and may become chronic with work and life participation problems.
“…Other studies have explored the role of trauma in the development of embitterment. To get a clearer picture, this construct needs to be studied in cultural context, because culture plays a crucial role in shaping one's personality, emotions and thought patterns (Spaaij et al, 2021).…”
The objective of this study was to construct a culturally valid Embitterment scale (ES), and to establish psychometric properties of the scale (reliability and validity). Phenomenology was explored; to explore the phenomenology open ended interviews were carried out, of 40 university students (BA/BS Hons), both men (20) and women (20), age ranging from 18 to 25. They were given the operational definition of the construct and were asked, about the characteristics an embittered person. Exploratory factor analysis was done, construct validity and test retest reliability were established. Out of 320 participants, 160 were men and 160 were women. Sample was divided into strata of age, gender and BS level. Convenient sampling was done to collect data from university students. The Embitterment Scale was correlated with Post Traumatic Embitterment Scale (PTES) with r = 0.62 and test -retest reliability of ES with r = .88 (p < 0.01). Factor analysis was carried out, through factor analysis three factors were obtained namely: Interpersonal Conflict, Intrapersonal Distress, and Rigid Sense of Self Righteousness. The embitterment scale was found to have adequate validity and reliability and can be used confidently to assess embitterment in student population. Keywords: embitterment, university students, culture, young adults.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.