2016
DOI: 10.4018/ijossp.2016070102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exploratory Study of Conflict over Paying Debian Developers

Abstract: This article reports on an exploratory study of the causes and effects of conflict within the open source software project, Debian. Conflict arose when the project leader decided to introduce payment for select volunteers within an all-volunteer project to speed up the release of Debian. The study utilized the theoretical framework of Boltanski and Thévenot for understanding disputes. The results of the survey of Debian developers show that the conditions for conflict were complex and were driven by perception… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While paid developers may share a passion and interest for a project, ultimately they have a different "master to serve." An infamous example of this is the case of the Debian project, when a decision to pay two Debian volunteers (the 'Dunc-Tank' experiment) led to a considerable uproar in the community [28], and led some volunteers to reduce their involvement: "Some people who used to do good work reduced their involvement drastically" [9]. While there is some work on developers' intentions to accept monetary compensation [4,46], the more general question, i.e., how volunteer (unpaid) developers view paid developers, is not well understood.…”
Section: Perceptions On Paid Developersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While paid developers may share a passion and interest for a project, ultimately they have a different "master to serve." An infamous example of this is the case of the Debian project, when a decision to pay two Debian volunteers (the 'Dunc-Tank' experiment) led to a considerable uproar in the community [28], and led some volunteers to reduce their involvement: "Some people who used to do good work reduced their involvement drastically" [9]. While there is some work on developers' intentions to accept monetary compensation [4,46], the more general question, i.e., how volunteer (unpaid) developers view paid developers, is not well understood.…”
Section: Perceptions On Paid Developersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to traditional paid software development work, and despite its benefits to OSS contributors, introducing financial incentives in OSS communities create complex feelings among OSS developers [70]. Developers on the Debian project, for example, expressed negative emotion because they felt payment went against the project's espoused values [71]. On the other side, not receiving pay for their work to support their livelihoods can frustrate OSS developers and affect their contributions [70].…”
Section: Theory Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%