An exploratory pilot study of the effect of modified hygiene kits on handwashing with soap among internally displaced persons in Ethiopia

Abstract

Background Internally displaced persons fleeing their homes due to conflict and drought are particularly at risk of morbidity and mortality from diarrhoeal diseases. Regular handwashing with soap (HWWS) could substantially reduce the risk of these infections, but the behaviour is challenging to practice while living in resource-poor, informal settlements. To mitigate these challenges, humanitarian aid organisations distribute hygiene kits, including soap and handwashing infrastructure. Our study aimed to assess the effect of modified hygiene kits on handwashing behaviours among internally displaced persons in Moyale, Ethiopia. Methods The pilot study evaluated three interventions: providing liquid soap; scented soap bar; and the inclusion of a mirror in addition to the standard hygiene kit. The hygiene kits were distributed to four study arms. Three of the arms received one of the interventions in addition to the standard hygiene kit. Three to six weeks after distribution the change in behaviour and perceptions of the interventions were assessed through structured observations, surveys and focus group discussions. Results HWWS was rare at critical times for all study arms. In the liquid soap arm, HWWS was observed for only 20% of critical times. This result was not indicated significantly different from the control arm which had a prevalence of 17% (p-value = 0.348). In the mirror and scented soap bar intervention arms, HWWS prevalence was 11 and 10%, respectively. This was indicated to be significantly different from the control arm. Participants in the focus group discussions indicated that liquid soap, scented soap bar and the mirror made handwashing more desirable. In contrast, participants did not consider the soap bar normally distributed in hygiene kits as nice to use. Conclusion We found no evidence of an increased prevalence of handwashing with soap following distribution of the three modified hygiene kits. However, our study indicates the value in better understanding hygiene product preferences as this may contribute to increased acceptability and use among crisis-affected populations. The challenges of doing research in a conflict-affected region had considerable implications on this study’s design and implementation. Trial registration The trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov 6 September 2019 (reg no: NCT04078633).

A cross-sectional study design to assess the determinants of the nutritional status of children aged 6 to 59 months who returned to Gedeo after being internally displaced in the Guji-Gedeo conflict, in Gedeb district, SNNPR, Ethiopia: Bayesian Binary Logistic Regression Approach

“…As a result, the infant's malnutrition worsens, making him or her more susceptible to infections such as diarrhea and other infectious diseases. This study is consistent with a study conducted in Guinea-Bissau [26,41]. Similarly, a child's prior birth interval is a strong predictor of nutritional status.…”

Lessons from the deployment and management of public handwashing stations in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Kenya: A cross-sectional, observational study

“…Additionally, this study points out that design considerations on the drainage of wastewater, height, and soap placement affect the usability of HWSs. Other studies support this finding as they suggest that the design features provide a pleasant and convenient user experience for all users [ 25 , 26 ]. Users expressed concern about bar soaps and HWSs being perceived as dirty and a source of potential transmission of pathogens, due to the number of people that touch the soap at the HWS before them.…”

Using Wash’Em to design handwashing programmes for crisis-affected populations in Zimbabwe: A Process Evaluation

“…Each activity comes with a step-bystep guide to aid organisations in planning the logistics and delivery of their programme. The Wash'Em process was designed based on several years of research and iterative improvements based on feedback from humanitarian actors [14,17,18]. It can be completed in as little as two days [19] and has already been used in more than 94 humanitarian responses since March 2020.…”