2016
DOI: 10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exploratory Pilot Study of Student Learning Experiences in Engineering Technology Courses Designed to Promote Creativity

Abstract: We report on the findings from an exploratory pilot study using the experience-sampling method (ESM) and interviews to examine learning in two undergraduate engineering technology courses designed to promote creativity. Results of the ESM analysis showed that students’ positive experience decreased slightly in the first course and increased slightly in the latter course. Surprisingly, both instructors’ presence caused students to report lower levels of willingness to express a creative idea and feel like other… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other researchers have found that engineering instructors are not familiar with teaching or evaluating creativity, even during design projects and open‐ended assignments (Cropley, ; Kazerounian & Foley, ; Zappe, Mena, & Litzinger, ). Recent work by Katz‐Buonincontro, Davis, Aghayere, and Rosen () used the experience‐sampling method with engineering technology students to elicit student beliefs about creativity in the classroom. Their results indicated that students were frustrated during a first course emphasizing creativity, but had an increased positive experience in a second course.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers have found that engineering instructors are not familiar with teaching or evaluating creativity, even during design projects and open‐ended assignments (Cropley, ; Kazerounian & Foley, ; Zappe, Mena, & Litzinger, ). Recent work by Katz‐Buonincontro, Davis, Aghayere, and Rosen () used the experience‐sampling method with engineering technology students to elicit student beliefs about creativity in the classroom. Their results indicated that students were frustrated during a first course emphasizing creativity, but had an increased positive experience in a second course.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the analysis of the reflection journals, we found results that match fairly closely with those of the survey questions collected directly after the dissection activity. These results indicate that the majority of students found positive ties to their own idea generation (30). Specifically, participant 1 said:…”
Section: Idea Generation Drawing Inspirationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In order to be more creative during the design process, Tierney and Farmer have shown that creative idea generation can indeed be taught and shaped through the immersion of "creative work… [and] 'deliberate practice'" [8]. One way to gauge one's creative ability is through the measure of Creative Self-Efficacy (CSE) [30], [31]. CSE is a measure of one's belief in their creative ability and has been shown to be a predictor of future creative success.…”
Section: Creative Idea Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSE has been connected to an increase in intrinsic motivation, and creative performance [20], [23] - [25]. Research into the CSE of students revealed that there were challenges in the traditional STEM classroom intended to prepare students for engineering, that inhibited the growth of CSE, and there were unique challenges for women students [11], [26], [27]. Ohland et.…”
Section: Creativity In Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%