2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10643-012-0540-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exploratory Look at the Relationships Among Math Skills, Motivational Factors and Activity Choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
46
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Children who intuitively pay more attention to numerosity in SFON tasks might enter more quickly into skillful counting or might be more motivated to practice counting (Hannula, Räsänen, & Lehtinen, 2007). Individual differences in SFON are consistently related to children's counting skills such as subitizing in the small number range and rote counting in the large number range (Batchelor, Inglis, & Gilmore, 2015;Edens & Potter, 2013;Hannula & Lehtinen, 2005;Hannula et al, 2007); furthermore, SFON in 3.5-year-old children is related to higher subsequent mathematical knowledge at ages 5 and 12 (Hannula & Lehtinen, 2005;Hannula-Sormunen, Lehtinen, & Räsänen, 2015). However, the current study differs from previous SFON studies in several important ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Children who intuitively pay more attention to numerosity in SFON tasks might enter more quickly into skillful counting or might be more motivated to practice counting (Hannula, Räsänen, & Lehtinen, 2007). Individual differences in SFON are consistently related to children's counting skills such as subitizing in the small number range and rote counting in the large number range (Batchelor, Inglis, & Gilmore, 2015;Edens & Potter, 2013;Hannula & Lehtinen, 2005;Hannula et al, 2007); furthermore, SFON in 3.5-year-old children is related to higher subsequent mathematical knowledge at ages 5 and 12 (Hannula & Lehtinen, 2005;Hannula-Sormunen, Lehtinen, & Räsänen, 2015). However, the current study differs from previous SFON studies in several important ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present research, we developed two non-verbal numerical tasks, inspired by Hannula and colleagues' research on 'spontaneously focusing on numerosity' or SFON (e.g., Edens & Potter, 2013;Hannula & Lehtinen, 2005;McMullen, Hannula-Sormunen, & Lehtinen, 2013see Rathé et al, 2016, for a recent review). SFON is defined by Hannula and Lehtinen (2005) as a child's self-generated tendency to pay attention to and engage with quantities and number without prompting or any explicit cues in the environment.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SFON tendency not only describes children's activities in laboratory tasks, but observation studies show that SFON tendency is also an indicator of children's spontaneous self-initiated practice of their early numerical skills in their everyday surroundings (Hannula, Mattinen, & Lehtinen, 2005). Studies show that SFON tendency (a) is a domain-specific predictor of mathematical achievement Hannula, Lepola, Lehtinen, 2010), (b) can be enhanced through social interaction (Hannula, Mattinen, & Lehtinen, 2005), and (c) is a crossculturally relevant concept for describing the development of early mathematical skills (Edens & Potter, 2013;Kucian et al, 2012). These results suggest that research into children's spontaneous quantitative focusing tendencies fills a crucial gap in research on children's mathematical competencies.…”
Section: Spontaneous Quantitative Focusing Tendenciesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A review of the published empirical literature on students' learning orientation specifically, or academic motivational goals more broadly, in the mathematics domain reveals complex and varied associations with positive relationships more likely to be found with younger samples than older samples. For example, researchers have found a positive relationship between teachers' ratings of preschoolers' motivation and their counting and spatial skills (Edens and Potter 2013). Among upper elementary students, those who are challenge seekers and have a learning-goal orientation are more likely to have higher self-efficacy in math (Meyer et al 1997).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%