An exploratory empirical analysis of willingness to pay for and use flying cars

Eker, Ugur; Fountas, Grigorios; Anastasopoulos, Panagiotis Ch.

doi:10.1016/j.ast.2020.105993

Cited by 36 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 63 publications

(56 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Unobserved heterogeneity refers to unobserved characteristics within independent variables, which may reflect unobserved tastes, preferences or experience of the respondents that are often difficult to identify through survey questions. If the effects of unobserved heterogeneity are left unaccounted for, the statistical analysis may lead to unreliable inferences and, subsequently, to erroneous policy implications ( Eker et al, 2020b ; Fountas et al, 2019 ; Mannering et al, 2016 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trips for outdoor exercise at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Scotland

Semple

Fountas

Fonzone

2021

Journal of Transport & Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has had exceptional effects on travel behaviour in the UK. This paper focuses specifically on the outdoor exercise trips of Scottish residents at several distinct points of the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the negative health consequences of limited exercise, this study aims to determine the sociodemographic and behavioural factors affecting frequency of outdoor exercise trips. Methods Using recent public survey data (n=6000), random parameters ordered probit models (with allowances for heterogeneity in the means of random parameters) are estimated for three points during the pandemic: the most stringent lockdown, modest restriction easing and further easing of restrictions. Results The survey data show frequent outdoor exercise in the early stages of the pandemic, with ∼46% making six or more weekly trips during lockdown, reducing to ∼39% during the first phase of restriction easing, and further to ∼34% during the following phase of easing. The model estimations show that common factors, dominated by socioeconomic and demographic variables, influenced the frequency of outdoor exercise trips across most survey groups. The modelling framework also allowed insights into the impact of unobserved characteristics within several independent variables; for example, the lockdown exercise trip rates of those with a health problem or disability, and those over 65, were both found to be dependent on personal vehicle access. Conclusions The findings suggest that those with a health problem or disability, those who live in households’ where the main income earner is employed in a semi-skilled/unskilled manual occupation or is unemployed and ethnic minority groups (i.e., any mixed, Asian, or Black background) were significantly more likely to complete no weekly outdoor exercise trips throughout the pandemic. As a result, we suggest that these groups are at higher risk of the negative health consequences associated with limited physical activity. Policy implications are discussed in terms of mitigating this effect, as well as reducing transport inequity related to vehicle accessibility.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trips for outdoor exercise at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Scotland

Semple

Fountas

Fonzone

2021

Journal of Transport & Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…More broadly, connectivity and automation may create or foster synergies beyond road transportation to surface and air transportation, such as Urban Air Mobility (UAM) systems. While air mobility technology is still in a nascent stage of development, recent studies suggest that the UAM concept is replete with opportunities, including the harnessing connectivity and automation, that could profoundly impact the transportation systems of tomorrow (Ahmed et al, 2020a;Eker et al, 2020;Straubinger et al, 2020). Finally, it must be mentioned that, while vehicle connectivity can potentially enhance and help prepare traditional transportation systems for the inevitable era of autonomous vehicles, such benefits may be realized only when appropriate legislative initiatives and policies are established to address public concerns and perceptions regarding such emerging technologies (Kim et al, 2019;Ahmed et al, 2020b).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Vehicle Connectivity and Automation: A Sibling Relationship

Chen

et al. 2020

Front. Built Environ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The evolution of scientific advances has often been characterized by the amalgamation of two or more technologies. With respect to vehicle connectivity and automation, recent literature suggests that these two emerging transportation technologies can and will jointly and profoundly shape the future of transportation. However, it is not certain how the individual and synergistic benefits to be earned from these technologies is related to their prevailing levels of development. As such, it may be considered useful to revisit the primary concepts of automation and connectivity, and to identify any current and expected future synergies between them. Doing this can help generate knowledge that could be used to justify investments related to transportation systems connectivity and automation. In this discussion paper, we attempt to address some of these issues. The paper first reviews the technological concepts of systems automation and systems connectivity, and how they prospectively, from an individual and collective perspective, impact road transportation efficiency and safety. The paper also discusses the separate and common benefits of connectivity and automation, and their possible holistic effects in terms of these benefits where they overlap. The paper suggests that at the current time, the sibling relationship seems to be lopsided: vehicle connectivity has immense potential to enhance vehicle automation. Automation, on the other hand, may not significantly promote vehicle connectivity directly, at least not in the short term but possibly in the long term. The paper argues that future trends regarding market adoption of these two technologies and their relative pace of advancement or regulation, will shape the future synergies between them.

show abstract

“…17. These challenges are closely related to public perceptions towards the future commercialization of FCTS in the real market [60], [61].…”

Section: The Challenges Of Fctsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Flying Car Transportation System: Advances, Techniques, and Challenges

Pan

Alouini

2021

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the development of transport systems, humans have exploited ground-level, belowground, and high-altitude spaces for transportation purposes. However, with the increasing burden of expanding populations and rapid urbanization in recent decades, public transportation systems and freight traffic are suffering huge pressure, plaguing local governments and straining economies. Engineers and researchers have started to re-examine, propose, and develop the underused near-ground spaces (NGS) for transportation purposes. For instance, flying cars, which are not a totally novel idea, aim at solving the traffic congestion problem and releasing the strains on existing city transport networks by utilizing unoccupied NGS. Flying cars differ from traditional grounded transportation systems that are entirely limited by their physical space, such as trains on tracks or automobiles on roads. Flying cars do not occupy or compete for high-altitude spaces used by air traffic for long-distance transfer. As there is limited specific literature on flying cars and flying car transportation systems (FCTS), this paper aims to describe the modern advances, techniques, and challenges of FCTS. We explore the inherent nature of NGS transportation and devise useful proposals to facilitate the construction and commercialization of FCTS. We begin with an introduction to the increasing need for NGS transportation and we address the advantages of using flying cars. Next, we present a brief overview of the history of the development of flying cars in terms of the historic timeline and technique development. Then, we discuss and compare the state of the art in the design of flying cars, including the take-off & landing (TOL) modes, pilot modes, operation modes, and power types, which are related to the adaptability, flexibility & comfort, stability & complexity, and environmental friendliness of flying cars, respectively. Additionally, since large-scale operations of flying cars can improve current transportation problems, we also introduce different facets of the various designs of FCTS, including path and trajectory planning, supporting facilities, and commercial designs. Finally, we discuss the challenges that might arise while developing and commercializing FCTS in terms of safety issues, commercial issues, and ethical issues.

show abstract

An exploratory empirical analysis of willingness to pay for and use flying cars

Cited by 36 publications

References 63 publications

Trips for outdoor exercise at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Scotland

Trips for outdoor exercise at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Scotland

Vehicle Connectivity and Automation: A Sibling Relationship

Flying Car Transportation System: Advances, Techniques, and Challenges

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About