2002
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.10021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exploratory assessment of the purposes of performance appraisals in north and central america and the pacific rim

Abstract: While performance appraisals are considered important management tools in many countries, their purposes and practices vary significantly between countries. Unfortunately, there is little empirical data on the specific practices of appraisals across countries. The focus of this study is to empirically examine the current purposes of performance appraisals in ten different countries and regions in Asia, North America, and Latin America. The purposes of appraisals studied here include documentation, development,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For that reason, we assume that one of the aims of performance appraisal is establishing and enhancing trust between employees and the organization. Thus, positive interactions and reciprocities between employees and the organization concerning performance appraisal are more important than any other institutional factors (Milliman, Nason, Zhu, & De Cieri, 2002). To be specific, studies empirically find a strong and positive relationship between perceived developmental performance appraisal use (e.g., performance feedback and identifying ratees’ training needs) and ratees’ performance appraisal acceptance or satisfaction (Boswell & Boudreau, 2000; Dipboye & de Pontbriand, 1981; Gosselin, Werner, & Halle, 1997).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, we assume that one of the aims of performance appraisal is establishing and enhancing trust between employees and the organization. Thus, positive interactions and reciprocities between employees and the organization concerning performance appraisal are more important than any other institutional factors (Milliman, Nason, Zhu, & De Cieri, 2002). To be specific, studies empirically find a strong and positive relationship between perceived developmental performance appraisal use (e.g., performance feedback and identifying ratees’ training needs) and ratees’ performance appraisal acceptance or satisfaction (Boswell & Boudreau, 2000; Dipboye & de Pontbriand, 1981; Gosselin, Werner, & Halle, 1997).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, appraisees are also not always happy with the PASs. They generally show dissatisfaction toward the appraisal process and also to other human resource (HR) decisions which are made on the basis of appraisal ratings (Milliman, Nason, Zhu, & De Cieri, 2002). If employees perceive PAS unfair or they have negative attitudes toward the system, then there is a great possibility for development of such attitudes toward the whole organization (Whiting & Kline, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Germany and France exhibit high individualism (Hofstede, 2001). Milliman and colleagues (2002b) suggest that highly individualistic societies value promotion and compensation outputs in a performance management process. For the German case, Festing and Barzantny (2008) find this issue slightly attenuated due to the importance of training and long-term development rooted in the German working environment.…”
Section: Country-specific Characteristics Of Performance Management: mentioning
confidence: 99%