An exploratory analysis of earnings management practices in Australia and New Zealand

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore corporate earnings management practices in Australia and New Zealand before and after the regulatory changes and corporate governance reforms. The study argues that the effectiveness of regulatory reforms has to be reflected in constraining earnings management in post-reform period as compared to pre-reform period. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of 3,966 firm-year observations, including all ASX and NZX listed firms for the period 2001-2006, the study examines earnings management practices in both countries in pre- and post-reform periods with appropriate statistical methods. Findings The results indicate some interesting phenomenon: the magnitude of earnings management did not decline after the governance reform as a positive time trend is observed in the entire sample as well as in Australian and New Zealand sub-samples, suggesting that earnings management has been growing over time. Additional test indicates no structural change has occurred before and after the new regulations. The shifting from decreasing earnings management to increasing earnings management can be interpreted as an evidence that earnings become more ‘informative’ in a more transparent disclosure regime to capture short-run benefits from regulator reforms. Research limitations/implications The shifting of earnings management behaviour from decreasing to increasing income can be interpreted as the outcome of more “informative”, rather than “deliberate”, earnings management in a more transparent disclosure regime to capture short-run benefits of regulatory reforms, which is worth further investigation. The findings of the study can lead regulatory authorities taking appropriate measures to promote earnings quality in corporate financial reporting from a long-run decision usefulness context. Any future reforms should be directed to protecting the interest of stakeholders as well as ensuring benefits outweighing costs for them. Practical implications The findings of the study can lead regulatory authorities in taking appropriate measures to promote earnings quality in corporate financial reporting from a long-run decision usefulness context. Originality/value The study adds value to the existing earnings management literature as well as effectiveness of regulations for the benefit of wider stakeholder groups.

The Effect of Fiscal Incentive on Earning Management among Listed Companies in Indonesia

“…Residual value of this modified Jones model estimation is free from company's condition variable 22 , thus this residual value would represent the magnitude of accrual discretionary or abnormal accruals (DA). DA will be the dependent variable in regression model of this research.…”

“…DA will be the dependent variable in regression model of this research. DA value can be positive, negative, or 0 21,22 . DA with a positive value shows that accrual earnings management will increase net income.…”

“…The use of accrual discretionary in earnings management is more desirable in terms of cost because it does not have any effect on cash flow compared to real earnings management. Hence, it is easier and less costly for companies to conduct accrual earnings management [20][21][22] . He 8 explains that the risk of earnings management activity is not limited to litigation, but also reputation in the long term.…”

Good Corpotare Governance dan Manajemen Laba di Perbankan Syariah

“…Manajemen laba secara luas dianggap sebagai cara mendistorsi atau memanipulasi laba akuntansi untuk menguntungkan para manajer dengan mengorbankan pemegang saham (Sun & Al Farooque, 2018). Manajemen laba ini dapat terjadi pada semua jenis perusahaan, baik pada perusahaan keuangan maupun non keuangan.…”

“…Hasil penelitian ini didukung oleh hasil penelitianFarida et al (2010),Riadiani & Wahyudin (2015),Sun & Al Farooque (2018), danMersni & Ben Othman (2016) yang menunjukkan hasil bahwa proporsi dewan komisaris tidak berpengaruh terhadap manajemen laba. Penelitian ini menemukan hasil yang berbeda denganNasution & Setiawan (2007),Obigbemi et al (2016) danKolsi & Grassa (2017) yang memperoleh hasil bahwa proporsi komisaris independen berpengaruh negatif terhadap manajemen laba.…”