2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00394-008-0743-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An explorative study of in vivo digestive starch characteristics and postprandial glucose kinetics of wholemeal wheat bread

Abstract: Starch in WB seems to be partly rapidly and partly slowly digestible. Postprandial insulin response and endogenous glucose production after WB ingestion might not solely be determined by the digestive characteristics of starch; other components of WB seem to affect glucose homeostasis. In vitro measurements might not always predict in vivo starch digestion precisely.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our observation of approximately 100% bioavailability of [U- 13 C]glucose is in line with previous observations [42][43][44], absorption of more slowly absorbed sugars (sucrose and fructose) is not necessarily assumed to be related to the absorption of the meal tracer. A limitation, of limited clinical significance, is that we were unable to separate EGP and glucose appearance from complex carbohydrates, which would have required intrinsic labelling of glucose in the starch [14]. The crucial clinically relevant information, is not how much of the postprandial glucose appearance is attributable to EGP vs meal-derived oral glucose, but rather the discrepancy between total postprandial glucose appearance and glucose disposal, which make up the postprandial glucose excursion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although our observation of approximately 100% bioavailability of [U- 13 C]glucose is in line with previous observations [42][43][44], absorption of more slowly absorbed sugars (sucrose and fructose) is not necessarily assumed to be related to the absorption of the meal tracer. A limitation, of limited clinical significance, is that we were unable to separate EGP and glucose appearance from complex carbohydrates, which would have required intrinsic labelling of glucose in the starch [14]. The crucial clinically relevant information, is not how much of the postprandial glucose appearance is attributable to EGP vs meal-derived oral glucose, but rather the discrepancy between total postprandial glucose appearance and glucose disposal, which make up the postprandial glucose excursion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The postprandial glucose excursion is defined by interactions between total postprandial glucose appearance (from sugars and complex carbohydrates), endogenous glucose production (EGP) and glucose disposal. Defining the precise contribution of complex carbohydrate is methodologically difficult, requiring the intrinsic labelling of glucose in starch [14]. Hence, the precise mechanisms of postprandial hyperglycaemia for meals containing complex carbohydrates have not yet been elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, fermentation of starch that reaches the colon increases the production of SCFA, which are associated with several health benefits (6,7). Information about starch digestibility can be obtained from in vitro assays (8), which, however, might not always predict the in vivo starch digestion, as we have shown before (9). In addition, carbohydrate-rich foods are often classified using the GI, which reflects the effect on postprandial blood glucose concentrations (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of insulin data points inside the acceptance range is higher after individualization than before for all verification data sets. However, the percentage of glucose data points within range goes down for 2 studies (Priebe et al, 48 WachtersHagedoorn et al 51 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%