2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exploration of Think-aloud Protocols Linked with Eye-gaze Tracking: Are they Talking about what they are Looking at

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the request to verbalise could also have influenced participants' gaze since concurrent think-aloud can affect the manner in which participants look at visual materials (e.g. Hertzum et al, 2009;Oh et al, 2013). Further, verbalisations were added to the study as a second measure for expertise and were introduced since the teachers indicated that students are required to describe images while they perform class activities.…”
Section: Are There Significant Differences In Terms Of the Verbalisation Score Between The Groups?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the request to verbalise could also have influenced participants' gaze since concurrent think-aloud can affect the manner in which participants look at visual materials (e.g. Hertzum et al, 2009;Oh et al, 2013). Further, verbalisations were added to the study as a second measure for expertise and were introduced since the teachers indicated that students are required to describe images while they perform class activities.…”
Section: Are There Significant Differences In Terms Of the Verbalisation Score Between The Groups?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Navyše, aj keď dĺžka fi xácie by mala odzrkadľovať, aký objem pozornosti je pridelený fi xovaným a oblastiam blízkym fi xovanej oblasti, tak tento objem nemusí vyjadrovať len relevantnosť podnetu, a preto pridelenie pozornosti, ale taktiež zaujímavosť podnetu, jeho zložitosť alebo jednoduchosť, čo v konečnom dôsledku môže viesť k odlišným interpretáciám dĺžky a distribúcie fi xácií. Preto je dôležité výstupy z merania pohybov očí pre komplexnú interpretáciu kombinovať s inými technikami ako napríklad verbálnymi protokolmi (think--aloud protocols), ktoré môžu mať podobu súbežného myslenia nahlas (concurrent think-aloud), alebo vo forme retrospektívneho myslenia nahlas (retrospective think--aloud) (Elling, Lentz & de Jong, 2012;Ericsson & Simon, 1993;Oh, Almarode & Tai, 2013). Taktiež môžu byť kombinované s rôznymi testami porozumenia či retrospektívnymi rozhovormi, ktoré bližšie vysvetľujú, čo skúmaného jedinca zaujalo a ako sledovaný materiál či scénu vnímal.…”
Section: Druhy Očných Pohybovunclassified
“…Thinkaloud and verbal probing approaches assume that participants can report and even evaluate their own cognitive processes (Willson and Miller, 2014). However, the think-aloud method in combination with ET has been criticized (Oh et al, 2013). Verbal probing uses an afterwards/debriefing survey design that is more suitable in combination with ET and is appropriate for cognitive and decision process investigations (Caspar et al, 1999;Willson and Miller, 2014).…”
Section: Cognitive Interviewingmentioning
confidence: 99%