2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:leri.0000037198.37750.0e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exploration of the Relationship Among Teacher Efficacy, Collective Teacher Efficacy, and Goal Consensus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
15

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
23
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Teacher efficacy accounts for roughly 20% of the variation in perceptions regarding collective efficacy. Kurz & Knight (2004) found that collective teacher efficacy correlated with all of the other variables examined (individual teacher efficacy, collective teacher efficacy, and goal consensus/vision), but was most highly correlated with goal consensus/vision. Goddard & Goddard (2001) indicated significant variation among schools in teacher efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Teacher efficacy accounts for roughly 20% of the variation in perceptions regarding collective efficacy. Kurz & Knight (2004) found that collective teacher efficacy correlated with all of the other variables examined (individual teacher efficacy, collective teacher efficacy, and goal consensus/vision), but was most highly correlated with goal consensus/vision. Goddard & Goddard (2001) indicated significant variation among schools in teacher efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Goal consensus/vision has a relationship with individual teacher efficacy and collective teacher efficacy (Kurz & Knight, 2004: N =: 113; Teacher Efficacy Scale, Gibson & Dembo, 1984; See APPEND IX G for scale ps ychometrics). This study explored the relationships among individual teacher efficacy, collective teacher efficacy, and goal consensus/vision.…”
Section: Collective Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar finding has also been reported by many studies in the literature (Ekici, 2006;Derbedek, 2008;Gençtürk and Memiş, 2010;Tschannen-Moran and Woolfolk Hoy, 2007;Üstüner, Demirtaş, Cömert and Özer, 2009;Yılmaz and Çokluk-Bökeoğlu, 2008;Döş and Özdemir Doğan, 2016). However, there are few studies reporting that self-efficacy beliefs of male teachers are stronger (Korkut and Babaoğlan, 2012) and few studies reporting that self-efficacy beliefs of female teachers are stronger (Kurz, 2001). This finding can be interpreted that females are becoming more equal to men in Turkey.…”
Section: Discussion Results and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers with high self-efficacy are able to produce desired results in the learning process particularly in the performance, achievements and motivation of the students. Teacher efficacy can affect the tasks of managing and motivating students, in that teachers with low self-efficacy might avoid planning activities that they believe exceed their capabilities, might not persist with students that have difficulties, might expend little effort into finding materials and might not teach content in ways that help students understand better (Kurz & Knight 2003). Teachers with high self-efficacy are more likely to develop challenging activities, help students succeed and persevere with students who have trouble learning (Kurz & Knight 2003).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers with high self-efficacy are more likely to develop challenging activities, help students succeed and persevere with students who have trouble learning (Kurz & Knight 2003). Studies on self-efficacy or the sense of efficacy of teachers have explored many fields of study and contexts, such as individual relationships, collective efficacy and goal (Kurz & Knight 2003), collective efficacy at the classroom level (Putney & Broughton, 2011), self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers (Tschannen-Moran & Woolfolk Hoy, 2007;Marshall, Horton, Igo, & Switzer, 2007), self-efficacy of mathematics teachers (Marshall et al, 2007;Chang, 2010), self-efficacy of pre-service teachers (Cerit, 2010), self-efficacy of science teachers (Cantrell, Young, & Moore, 2017;Smolleck, Carla & Yoder, 2006;Arigbabu et al, 2009), self-efficacy and burn out in teaching (Friedman, 2003), teacher self-efficacy on the curriculum reform (McCormick & Ayres, 2009;Charalambous & Philippou, 2010) and self-efficacy on the technological pedagogical content (Lee & Tsai, 2008). No related study was found in the search of the literature based on the self-efficacy of teachers in the context of Sri Lanka.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%