2018
DOI: 10.1111/myc.12799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exploration of the optimum dosage and number of cycles of itraconazole pulse therapy for severe onychomycosis

Abstract: Although standard itraconazole pulse therapy is a well-established regimen for toenail onychomycosis, the cure rate for onychomycosis remains low. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different cycles of itraconazole pulse therapy, determine the optimal dosage and number of cycles for onychomycosis. A total of 90 outpatients of our hospital with onychomycosis were randomised into three treatment groups: (1) standard itraconazole pulse therapy (200 mg twice per day, 1 week each month for three pulses); (2) lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
6
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, our clearance rate was higher than that reported by Zhang et al 20 who showed mycological cure in 41% of a group of patients who received itraconazole-pulse therapy in the same dose and duration. Our higher response may be attributed to the prevalence of fingernail onychomycosis (90%) in our study which has a better therapeutic outcome, compared to toenail disease in the other study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, our clearance rate was higher than that reported by Zhang et al 20 who showed mycological cure in 41% of a group of patients who received itraconazole-pulse therapy in the same dose and duration. Our higher response may be attributed to the prevalence of fingernail onychomycosis (90%) in our study which has a better therapeutic outcome, compared to toenail disease in the other study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…On the contrary, our clearance rate was much lower than the same study performed by Zhang et al 20 who treated another group of patients with 6 pulses of itraconazole, with 91% mycological cure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Of the 302 PubMed initial search results, 182 clinical trials (28,352 participants) met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis 6–186 . The PRISMA study selection process is detailed in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, trial lengths were relatively short, with average follow-up of 46.1 weeks (SD: 21.5; range: 24–78.2 weeks). In contrast, pivotal RCTs on oral terbinafine [ 8 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ], oral itraconazole [ 8 , 50 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 ], and topical efinaconazole [ 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ] had average follow-ups of 69.0 (SD: 49.1; range: 36–252), 66.4 (SD: 55.8; range: 19–252), and 62.1 (SD: 28.7; range: 40–104.3) weeks, respectively. Taken together, medicine-only combination therapy trials were much less rigorously designed than pivotal monotherapy trials, and therefore should be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the terbinafine package insert, liver enzyme abnormalities and taste disturbances were only reported in 3.3% and 2.8% of patients, respectively, with a discontinuation rate of 0.2% for both ( , accessed on 18 January 2022). Oral itraconazole monotherapy is well tolerated, with the most common reported adverse events being gastrointestinal discomfort and headache, both mild and transient [ 66 ], and with safety profiles similar between placebo and itraconazole treatment groups in a phase-III RCT [ 64 ]. In two phase-III multicenter RCTs assessing topical efinaconazole monotherapy [ 68 ], rates of adverse events were similar between treatment and vehicle groups in both studies, with most mild or moderate in severity, low rates of treatment-related discontinuation, and no clinically meaningful laboratory or vital sign changes from baseline.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%