Abstract:Purpose
Money laundering activities were allegedly rampant and poorly regulated in the South African financial markets and financial institutions prior to 1998. In other words, prior to the enactment of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998 as amended (POCA), there was no statute that expressly and adequately provided for the regulation of money laundering in South Africa. Consequently, the POCA was enacted to curb organised criminal activities such as money laundering in South Africa. Thereafter, … Show more
“…Various statutes such as the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996, the POCA, the POCDATARA and the FICA were enacted in a bid to effectively regulate and control money laundering and related activities such as terrorist financing and drug trafficking (Chitimira, 2020, pp. 30–33; Chitimira, 2021, pp. 795–798).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the FICA stipulates that accountable institutions and other financial institutions that have legal persons, trusts and partnerships customers should comply with the risk management and compliance programme to establish the nature of their customers’ business and the ownership and control structure of such business to discourage and combat money laundering activities that are perpetrated by high-risk customers through juristic persons [s 21B(2)–(5) of the FICA]. In other words, the FICA requires accountable institutions and financial institutions to obtain adequate additional information from all the existing and current customers to acquire sufficient knowledge of their accounts and transactions to effectively detect and combat money laundering and related terrorist activities in South Africa (Chitimira, 2021, pp. 795–798).…”
Section: Historical Overview Of the Regulation Of Money Laundering In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This entails that financial institutions should carefully recognise all types of risks posed by money laundering and terrorist financing and assess them well so as to adopt robust control strategies to mitigate and monitor the identified risks (Chitimira, 2020, pp. 30–33; Chitimira, 2021, pp. 795–798).…”
Section: Historical Overview Of the Regulation Of Money Laundering In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongoing due diligence measures empower banks and other financial institutions to conduct additional, constant and continuous monitoring procedures on all financial customers to monitor their transactions to timeously detect money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities (s 21C of the FICA; Chitimira, 2020, pp. 30–33; Chitimira, 2021, pp. 795–798).…”
Section: Historical Overview Of the Regulation Of Money Laundering In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the FICA provides for the use of comprehensive due diligence measures to detect and combat money laundering in South Africa. Banks and other financial institutions are obliged to adopt and enforce comprehensive customer due diligence measures to detect, prevent and combat money laundering activities that are conducted by high-risk customers in South Africa (Chitimira, 2021, pp. 795–798).…”
Section: Historical Overview Of the Regulation Of Money Laundering In...mentioning
Purpose
This paper explores the historical aspects of customer due diligence and related anti-money laundering measures in South Africa. Customer due diligence measures are usually employed to ensure that financial institutions know their customers well by assessing them against the possible risks they might pose such as fraud, money laundering, Ponzi schemes and terrorist financing. Accordingly, customer due diligence measures enable banks and other financial institutions to assess their customers before they conclude any transactions with them. Customer due diligence measures that are utilised in South Africa include identification and verification of customer identity, keeping records of transactions concluded between customers and financial institutions, ongoing monitoring of customer account activities, reporting unusual and suspicious transactions and risk assessment programmes. The Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 (FICA) as amended by the Financial Intelligence Centre Amendment Act 1 of 2017 (Amendment Act) is the primary statute that provides for the adoption and use of customer due diligence measures to detect and combat money laundering in South Africa. Prior to the enactment of the FICA, several other statutes were enacted in a bid to prohibit money laundering in South Africa. Against this background, the article provides a historical overview analysis of these statutes to, inter alia, explore their adequacy and examine whether they consistently complied with the Financial Action Task Force Recommendations on the regulation of money laundering.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper provides an overview analysis of the historical aspects of the regulation and use of customer due diligence to combat money laundering in South Africa. In this regard, a qualitative research method as well as the doctrinal research method are used.
Findings
It is hoped that policymakers and other relevant persons will adopt the recommendations provided in the paper to enhance the curbing of money laundering in South Africa.
Research limitations/implications
The paper does not provide empirical research.
Practical implications
The paper is useful to all policymakers, lawyers, law students and regulatory bodies, especially, in South Africa.
Social implications
The paper advocates for the use of customer due diligence measures to curb money laundering in the South African financial markets and financial institutions.
Originality/value
The paper is original research on the South African anti-money laundering regime and the use of customer due diligence measures to curb money laundering in South Africa.
“…Various statutes such as the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996, the POCA, the POCDATARA and the FICA were enacted in a bid to effectively regulate and control money laundering and related activities such as terrorist financing and drug trafficking (Chitimira, 2020, pp. 30–33; Chitimira, 2021, pp. 795–798).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the FICA stipulates that accountable institutions and other financial institutions that have legal persons, trusts and partnerships customers should comply with the risk management and compliance programme to establish the nature of their customers’ business and the ownership and control structure of such business to discourage and combat money laundering activities that are perpetrated by high-risk customers through juristic persons [s 21B(2)–(5) of the FICA]. In other words, the FICA requires accountable institutions and financial institutions to obtain adequate additional information from all the existing and current customers to acquire sufficient knowledge of their accounts and transactions to effectively detect and combat money laundering and related terrorist activities in South Africa (Chitimira, 2021, pp. 795–798).…”
Section: Historical Overview Of the Regulation Of Money Laundering In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This entails that financial institutions should carefully recognise all types of risks posed by money laundering and terrorist financing and assess them well so as to adopt robust control strategies to mitigate and monitor the identified risks (Chitimira, 2020, pp. 30–33; Chitimira, 2021, pp. 795–798).…”
Section: Historical Overview Of the Regulation Of Money Laundering In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongoing due diligence measures empower banks and other financial institutions to conduct additional, constant and continuous monitoring procedures on all financial customers to monitor their transactions to timeously detect money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities (s 21C of the FICA; Chitimira, 2020, pp. 30–33; Chitimira, 2021, pp. 795–798).…”
Section: Historical Overview Of the Regulation Of Money Laundering In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the FICA provides for the use of comprehensive due diligence measures to detect and combat money laundering in South Africa. Banks and other financial institutions are obliged to adopt and enforce comprehensive customer due diligence measures to detect, prevent and combat money laundering activities that are conducted by high-risk customers in South Africa (Chitimira, 2021, pp. 795–798).…”
Section: Historical Overview Of the Regulation Of Money Laundering In...mentioning
Purpose
This paper explores the historical aspects of customer due diligence and related anti-money laundering measures in South Africa. Customer due diligence measures are usually employed to ensure that financial institutions know their customers well by assessing them against the possible risks they might pose such as fraud, money laundering, Ponzi schemes and terrorist financing. Accordingly, customer due diligence measures enable banks and other financial institutions to assess their customers before they conclude any transactions with them. Customer due diligence measures that are utilised in South Africa include identification and verification of customer identity, keeping records of transactions concluded between customers and financial institutions, ongoing monitoring of customer account activities, reporting unusual and suspicious transactions and risk assessment programmes. The Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 (FICA) as amended by the Financial Intelligence Centre Amendment Act 1 of 2017 (Amendment Act) is the primary statute that provides for the adoption and use of customer due diligence measures to detect and combat money laundering in South Africa. Prior to the enactment of the FICA, several other statutes were enacted in a bid to prohibit money laundering in South Africa. Against this background, the article provides a historical overview analysis of these statutes to, inter alia, explore their adequacy and examine whether they consistently complied with the Financial Action Task Force Recommendations on the regulation of money laundering.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper provides an overview analysis of the historical aspects of the regulation and use of customer due diligence to combat money laundering in South Africa. In this regard, a qualitative research method as well as the doctrinal research method are used.
Findings
It is hoped that policymakers and other relevant persons will adopt the recommendations provided in the paper to enhance the curbing of money laundering in South Africa.
Research limitations/implications
The paper does not provide empirical research.
Practical implications
The paper is useful to all policymakers, lawyers, law students and regulatory bodies, especially, in South Africa.
Social implications
The paper advocates for the use of customer due diligence measures to curb money laundering in the South African financial markets and financial institutions.
Originality/value
The paper is original research on the South African anti-money laundering regime and the use of customer due diligence measures to curb money laundering in South Africa.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.