An exploration of risk management in global industrial investment

Abstract

This article explores risk management in global industrial investment by identifying linkages and gaps between theories and practices. It identifies opportunities for further development of the field. Three related bodies of literature have been reviewed: risk management, global manufacturing and investment. The review suggests that risk management in global manufacturing is overlooked in the literature; that existing theoretical risk management processes are not well developed in the global manufacturing context and that the investment literature applies mainly to financial risk assessment rather than investment risk management structures. Further, there appears to be a serious lack of systematic industrial risk management in investment decision making. This article highlights the opportunities to deploy current good practices more effectively as well as the need to develop more robust theories of industrial investment risk management. The approach adopted to investigate this multidisciplinary topic included a historical review of literature to understand the diverse background of theoretical development. A case study research approach was adopted to collect data, involving four global manufacturing companies and one risk management advisory company to observe the patterns and rationale of current practices. Supporting arguments from secondary data sources reinforced the findings. The research focuses risk management in global industrial investment. It links theories with practice to understand the existing knowledge gap and proposes key research themes for further research.

An extended framework for supply chain risk management: incorporating the complexities of emerging industries and large-scale systems

“…See Kumar and Gregory (2013), for example, for a well-developed exposition on the evolution of risk and uncertainty in the academic literature. In this study, we adopt the definition of risk from Miller (1992, p.312), who uses "the label 'risk' to refer exclusively to unpredictability in corporate outcome variables".…”

Identifying design criteria for urban system ‘last-mile’ solutions – a multi-stakeholder perspective

“…Previous research also suggests empirical criteria for green supply chain performance measurement, while being operational in nature, are mostly specific to a focal company, and neglect broader environmental and social objectives (Gimenez and Tachizawa, 2012;Kumar Dey and Cheffi, 2013;Österle et al, 2015). From an operations management perspective, decisions often remain firmly based on transaction costs and risk, when future innovative solutions call for alternative performance indicators, and operational criteria to better assess capabilities (Björklund, Martinsen and Abrahamsson, 2012;Kumar and Gregory, 2013).…”

What Enables a High-Risk Project to Yield High Return from a Construction Contractor’s Perspective?

“…The risk-return tradeoff has been studied much in the financial industry [1,2,[15][16][17][18][19][20] The risk is defined as the degree of exposure to the uncertainty that can have a positive or a negative effect on outcome [21,22]. In the financial investment, the risk is usually divided into interest rate risk, market risk, credit risk, sovereign risk, and operating risk [2,23].…”