2013
DOI: 10.1137/110834500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Explicit Update Scheme for Inverse Parameter and Interface Estimation of Piecewise Constant Coefficients in Linear Elliptic PDEs

Abstract: We introduce a general and efficient method to recover piecewise constant coefficients occurring in elliptic partial differential equations as well as the interface where these coefficients have jump discontinuities. For this purpose, we use an output least squares approach with level set and augmented Lagrangian methods. Our formulation incorporates the inherent nature of the piecewise constant coefficients, which eliminates the need for a complicated nonlinear solve at every iteration. Instead, we obtain an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer to [16,24,32,36] for numerical implementations. The use of level set descriptions of the interfaces in the context of perimeter regularizations is described in [3,26,27]. Related to this is the use of total variation of a regularized Heaviside function with argument being a level set function, [22,40].…”
Section: Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to [16,24,32,36] for numerical implementations. The use of level set descriptions of the interfaces in the context of perimeter regularizations is described in [3,26,27]. Related to this is the use of total variation of a regularized Heaviside function with argument being a level set function, [22,40].…”
Section: Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverse problem of reconstructing piecewise constants Lamé parameters λ, µ and their jump sets Γ simultaneously has been considered in [12] and the question of stability is not so wellstudied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[u k ]| Γ := u k,+ − u k,− = 0, [β∇u k · n]| Γ := β + ∇u k,+ − β − ∇u k,− · n = 0, n is the normal of Γ, 1 ≤ k ≤ K, (1.2) in which u k,s = u k | Ω s , β(X) = β s for X ∈ Ω s , s = −, +. An important inverse problem related to the typical second order elliptic equation is to identify the coefficient β where one needs to either identify the physical properties of materials, i.e., the values (the parameter estimation problem) and/or detect the location and shape of inclusions/interfaces (the inverse geometric problem) using the data measured for u k , 1 ≤ k ≤ K on a subset of the domain or on a subset of the boundary ∂Ω [20,35,40]. This type of inverse problems arise from many applications in engineering and sciences, such as the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) [12,37] and groundwater or oil reservoir simulation [23,73].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that these inverse problems are usually ill-posed especially when the available data is rather limited. Numerical methods based on the output-least-squares formulation are commonly used to handle these types of inverse problems, see [15,18,20,35,39] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%