2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00021-021-00643-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Explicit Threshold for the Appearance of Lift on the Deck of a Bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main goal of this work regards the quantification of the smallness assumption on the inlet velocity that ensures the well-posedness of problem (1.3): an explicit upper bound on the size of the boundary datum h, in terms of the geometric constraints of the obstacle K and of the domain Ω, is given in Section 3, see Theorem 3.3 and Corollary 3.1, which then also yield an explicit upper bound for the solution of (1.3). Similar results were obtained in [20,22] regarding the unique solvability of (1.3) 1 under non-homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions on ∂Q. By following closely the proofs given by Fursikov & Rannacher in [15], one discovers that, in order to yield such explicit threshold, several tools of functional analysis must be carefully studied.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main goal of this work regards the quantification of the smallness assumption on the inlet velocity that ensures the well-posedness of problem (1.3): an explicit upper bound on the size of the boundary datum h, in terms of the geometric constraints of the obstacle K and of the domain Ω, is given in Section 3, see Theorem 3.3 and Corollary 3.1, which then also yield an explicit upper bound for the solution of (1.3). Similar results were obtained in [20,22] regarding the unique solvability of (1.3) 1 under non-homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions on ∂Q. By following closely the proofs given by Fursikov & Rannacher in [15], one discovers that, in order to yield such explicit threshold, several tools of functional analysis must be carefully studied.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Therefore, in Section (2.1) we firstly provide lower bounds for the Sobolev constant of the embedding H 1 (Ω) ⊂ L p (Ω), p ∈ [2,6], involving functions that vanish only on Γ W or on Γ I ∪ Γ W . Thus, symmetrization techniques as in [20,21,22] can only be applied after properly reflecting Ω with respect to the planes x = ±L, and performing a suitable even extension of the functions considered, as in [32,Chapter 2]. Secondly, in Section 2.2 we build an estimable solenoidal extension of the boundary datum h, namely, we look for a vector field v 0 ∈ H 1 (Ω) such that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here •, • ∂K denotes the duality pairing between W − 2 3 , 3 2 (∂K) and W 2 3 ,3 (∂K), while the minus sign is due to the fact that the outward unit normal n to Ω is directed towards the interior of K. In the case of suspension bridges, the boundary conditions should model an horizontal inflow on the (2d or 3d) face x = −L of Q, as in conditions (3.2) and (3.4), see also [19]. Then, the most relevant component of the force (2.9), leading to structural instability, is the lift force L K (u, p) which is oriented vertically and, in our generalized context, can be computed as…”
Section: Main Results and Applications To The Navier-stokes Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, it is easy to show from (10.4) that, in the case at hand, we have Consequently, the bifurcation due to these solutions is either subcritical or supercritical, a two-sided bifurcation being excluded. (18)…”
Section: Formulation Of Assumption (H4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective in [4] is rather basic and regards the existence of possible equilibrium configurations of the structure, at least for "small" data. Successively, several other papers have been dedicated to the investigation of further relevant properties of this model, such as well-posedness of the relevant initial-boundary value problem [22], large-time behavior and existence of a global attractor [19], and sharp threshold for uniqueness of the equilibrium configuration [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%