2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An explicit solution of the Alekseevski–Tate penetration equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modeling equation is numerically solved, though explicit solution for the model was developed more recently [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modeling equation is numerically solved, though explicit solution for the model was developed more recently [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the nonlinear nature of the equations, the penetration was obtained implicitly as a function of time, so that an explicit functional dependence of the penetration on material properties was not obtained. Walters and Williams [4,5, 6] obtained the velocities, length, and penetration as an explicit function of time by employing a perturbation solution of the nondimensional Alekseevski-Tate equations. Algebraic equations were obtained for a third-order perturbation solution which showed excellent agreement with the exact solution of the Tate equations for tungsten heavy alloy rods penetrating a semi-infinite armor plate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the nonlinear nature of these equations, the exact solution yields the penetration as an implicit function of time. An accurate, explicit solution to these equations, for each of the pertinent variables (penetration velocity, penetrator length, penetrator velocity, and penetration depth) was obtained by Walters and Williams [4,5,6] using a perturbation technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations