2005
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-05-03886-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An explicit characterization of Calogero–Moser systems

Abstract: Abstract. Combining theorems of Halphen, Floquet, and Picard and a Frobenius type analysis, we characterize rational, meromorphic simply periodic, and elliptic KdV potentials. In particular, we explicitly describe the proper extension of the Airault-McKean-Moser locus associated with these three classes of algebro-geometric solutions of the KdV hierarchy with special emphasis on the case of multiple collisions between the poles of solutions. This solves a problem left open since the mid-1970s.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All that provides motivation for a more detailed study of Picard potentials with a goal of a more explicit and complete description of them. In [3], such a description was obtained in the case when v(x) ≡ 1, and u(x) is either elliptic or periodic and bounded near the ends of the period strip or rational and holomorphic at ∞: in that case the pair u(x), 1 is Picard if and only if u(x) satisfies a suitable variant of the Calogero-Moser conditions. However, these examples are practically all the known results up to date about an explicit description of Picard potentials.…”
Section: Introduction and Statements Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All that provides motivation for a more detailed study of Picard potentials with a goal of a more explicit and complete description of them. In [3], such a description was obtained in the case when v(x) ≡ 1, and u(x) is either elliptic or periodic and bounded near the ends of the period strip or rational and holomorphic at ∞: in that case the pair u(x), 1 is Picard if and only if u(x) satisfies a suitable variant of the Calogero-Moser conditions. However, these examples are practically all the known results up to date about an explicit description of Picard potentials.…”
Section: Introduction and Statements Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recalling Section 2, we denote the Hill's discriminants of (4.3) Ly(x) = y ′′ (x) + q(x; τ)y(x) = Ey(x) and (4.4) y ′′ (x) + q T (x)y(x) = Ey(x) by ∆(E; τ) and ∆ T (E) respectively. Now we apply the following key fact about ∆ T (E): Since q n T (z) can be generated from C n T by finite times of Darboux transformations (see [12,Remark 2.7]), it is known (see e.g. [9, Remark 1.3]) that ∆ T (E) coincides with the Hill's discriminant of y ′′ (x) + C n T y(x) = Ey(x) with respect to the period 1, i.e.…”
Section: Location Of (Anti)periodic Eigenvaluesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this subsection we give a proof of the classification theorem of finite-gap potentials on elliptic curves with arbitrary number of poles [10,4,11]; this proof is based on differential Galois theory and follows [4, Section 4.1].…”
Section: The Classification Of Elliptic Finite Gap Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this subsection we review the basics on algebraically integrable ordinary differential operators. Most of this material is well known; we refer the reader to [13,16,15,17,10,4,5,11] and references therein.…”
Section: The General Theory Of Algebraically Integrable Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation