1988
DOI: 10.1016/0888-7543(88)90113-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An explanation for the phenotypic differences between patients bearing partial deletions of the DMD locus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

22
594
0
20

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,038 publications
(656 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
22
594
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…The most influential determining factor of whether a mutation preserves the function of these critical regions is whether the mutation results in a shift of the transcript reading frame. In large measure, in-frame deletions result in BMD and out-offrame deletions result in DMD (Monaco, 1988). However, there are exceptions to this 'reading frame rule.'…”
Section: Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most influential determining factor of whether a mutation preserves the function of these critical regions is whether the mutation results in a shift of the transcript reading frame. In large measure, in-frame deletions result in BMD and out-offrame deletions result in DMD (Monaco, 1988). However, there are exceptions to this 'reading frame rule.'…”
Section: Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A linear regression curve of the number of manually counted CD8 þ cells versus the pixel area they occupy in the microscopic field was obtained for each experiment (r 2 ¼ 0.81-0.95). For each sample, the average number of CD8 þ cells per random field was extrapolated from the standard curve and expressed as the number of CD8 þ cells per mm 2 . The results are presented as the increased number of CD8 þ cells in the treated muscle compared to the untreated muscle, thus demonstrating possible specific increases above the endogenous CD8 þ counts in dystrophic muscle.…”
Section: Immunohistochemical Detection Of Cd8 þ Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene that alter the open-reading frame of dystrophin. 2 The 427 kDa skeletal form of dystrophin has 3685 amino-acid residues and contains several domains: the amino-terminus domain that binds cytoskeletal actin filaments, a large rod-shaped domain formed by 24 repeat sequences that are predicted to adopt a triple helical conformation with four hinges and a carboxyl-terminus domain that binds a whole complex of dystrophin-associated proteins at the sarcolemma. 3 By binding to b-dystroglycan at the membrane, dystrophin acts as a physical link between the cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) is a less severe form of DMD, and develops signs in the thirties or later; its incidence is one-fifth to one-eighth of that of DMD. Both of these dystrophies have been elucidated to be caused by a common mutation consisting of deletion or duplication of exons within the dystrophin gene (Kingston et al, 1983;Kunkel et al, 1986;Monaco et al, 1988). Because DMD/BMD are still incurable, determining the carrier status and affected fetuses would be very useful for at-risk mothers or relatives whose family members are affected with DMD/BMD from the point of view of genetic counseling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%