2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An explainable attention-based TCN heartbeats classification model for arrhythmia detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, [10] used methods based on machine learning and required a lot of manual handling but also reported low accuracy. [12] reported a higher f1-score than us, but they did not show the result with detailed metric computation. We computed the macro f1-score, which is commonly used for imbalanced datasets.…”
Section: Originalcontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, [10] used methods based on machine learning and required a lot of manual handling but also reported low accuracy. [12] reported a higher f1-score than us, but they did not show the result with detailed metric computation. We computed the macro f1-score, which is commonly used for imbalanced datasets.…”
Section: Originalcontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Following the inter-patient paradigm, the resulting framework demonstrated an accuracy of 94.7% when assessed on the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia database. In the work detailed in [12], Zhao et al introduced an arrhythmia classification technique that leveraged the temporal Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to extract ECG features. They achieved an accuracy of 87.8%.…”
Section: A Ecg Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this standard, heartbeats are recommended to be grouped into five main classes (Shi et al 2019): Normal (N), Supraventricular ectopic beat (S), Ventricular ectopic beat (V), Fusion of ventricular and normal beat (F), and Unknown beat (Q). Although most studies adhere to this standard (Li et al 2022b;Zhao et al 2023;Wang et al 2019;Han et al 2022), some may choose alternative classification schemes (Lu et al 2021). The extensive use of this database has resulted in numerous published studies, providing ample opportunities for comparisons with previous results.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XAI is most frequently applied in industries requiring high decision-making accuracies and accountability levels, such as healthcare (Faust et al, 2023;Rivera et al, 2023;Z. Wang et al, 2023;Zhao, Ren, Zhang, Wu, & Lyu, 2023) and management (Angelotti & Díaz-Rodríguez, 2023;Langer & König, 2023;Lee, Jung, Lee, Kim, & Park, 2021). There is relatively less research in the area of explainable artificial intelligence in predictive maintenance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%