2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-665x/aa9b01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimentally validated model for geometrically nonlinear plucking-based frequency up-conversion in energy harvesting

Abstract: It is well known that plucking-based frequency up-conversion can enhance the power output in piezoelectric energy harvesting by enabling cyclic free vibration at the fundamental bending mode of the harvester even for very low excitation frequencies. In this work, we present a geometrically nonlinear plucking-based framework for frequency up-conversion in piezoelectric energy harvesting under quasistatic excitations associated with low-frequency stimuli such as walking and similar rigid body motions. Axial shor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum electromechanical coupling coefficient was obtained with an electrode coverage of 42%, but the strain distribution in this case is different from that of cantilever beams. Du et al provided an analysis of the electrode coverage for cantilever beams, showing the optimal coverage percentage of 44% [ 23 ], but the external force in this study is a uniformly distributed force along the beam length direction, which is different from the normally used base excitation [ 24 ] or tip excitation [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum electromechanical coupling coefficient was obtained with an electrode coverage of 42%, but the strain distribution in this case is different from that of cantilever beams. Du et al provided an analysis of the electrode coverage for cantilever beams, showing the optimal coverage percentage of 44% [ 23 ], but the external force in this study is a uniformly distributed force along the beam length direction, which is different from the normally used base excitation [ 24 ] or tip excitation [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the frequency of ambient vibrations is very low (e.g., in energy harvesting from human motion) the tip mass able to trim the harvester would be impractically large. Therefore, several frequency-up strategies have been proposed: they are based on specific devices like a flexible stopper [8], a non-linear plectrum [9], or a pendulum magnetically coupled with the harvester [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This energy is then released as the beam freely vibrates at its natural frequency. This technique was mainly implemented via impact interaction ( Abedini and Wang, 2019 ; Chen et al, 2017 ; Dauksevicius et al., 2019 ; Rui et al., 2021 ), contact plucking ( Kathpalia et al, 2017 ; Kuang and Zhu, 2017 ) and magnetic contactless plucking ( Chen et al, 2019 ; Kuang et al., 2016 ; Xue and Roundy, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%