1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3991(99)00009-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimentally convenient configuration for electron channeling contrast imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was reported that the image contrast is optimised at the condition s ⇡ 0 [60], and changes rapidly when s become negative [61]. Simulation work by Wilkinson [58] shows that the stress relaxation of a dislocation close to the crystal surface would only give minor e↵ects on the electron channelling contrast image.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was reported that the image contrast is optimised at the condition s ⇡ 0 [60], and changes rapidly when s become negative [61]. Simulation work by Wilkinson [58] shows that the stress relaxation of a dislocation close to the crystal surface would only give minor e↵ects on the electron channelling contrast image.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ECCI still has some limitations. Unlike TEM, ECCI of dislocations is only optimised with s = 0, and image contrast falls o↵ rapidly with both positive and negative deviations from the perfect Bragg condition [60].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, inspecting large area of flat surface could ensure the representativeness of the specimen. It is important to meet the exact Bragg-diffraction condition in order to distinguish dislocation lines from the background matrix (Simkin & Crimp, 1999). In the SEM, there are two approaches to achieve this condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECCI can be performed in either the backscatter geometry (sample at approximately 90 to the impinging electron beam with the backscattered electrons detected by an electronsensitive diode or diodes placed under the pole piece of the microscope) or forescatter geometry (sample is tilted between 30 and 70 to the impinging electron beam and the forescattered electrons detected by a diode placed in front of the sample). 28,31 The forescatter geometry provides better signal to noise when compared to the backscattered geometry. Detailed reviews on ECCI which discuss the relative advantages and disadvantages of the forescatter and the backscatter geometries are given by Wilkinson and Hirsch 32 and Simpkin and Crimp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed reviews on ECCI which discuss the relative advantages and disadvantages of the forescatter and the backscatter geometries are given by Wilkinson and Hirsch 32 and Simpkin and Crimp. 31 It is also necessary to use a detection system that allows discrimination between those electrons leaving the sample which carry channeling information and those which have been diffusely scattered by the sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%