2012
DOI: 10.1057/ap.2012.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental test of the impact of style and rhetoric on the perception of right-wing populist and mainstream party leaders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
125
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
125
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, our study differs from previous studies, such as Bos et al (2013) and Hameleers and Schmuck (2017), in the causal relationship that is tested, as well as in the conceptualization of key terms. We will briefly outline the main differences between these studies and ours.…”
Section: Populism and Political Cynicismmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…More specifically, our study differs from previous studies, such as Bos et al (2013) and Hameleers and Schmuck (2017), in the causal relationship that is tested, as well as in the conceptualization of key terms. We will briefly outline the main differences between these studies and ours.…”
Section: Populism and Political Cynicismmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Bos et al (2013) show that populist messages make citizens more likely to support populist parties. Yet, this effect is restricted to voters who are already cynical.…”
Section: Populism and Political Cynicismmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations