2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8009(03)00192-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental test of response consistency in contingent valuation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is true both for studies exploring intention to buy and willingness to pay for fish products. In this respect, contingent valuation studies from the field of experimental economics can offer insights on how to by-pass hypothetical bias in willingness to pay (Camacho-Cuena, García-Gallego, Georgantzís, & Sabater-Grande, 2003;Lusk & Shogren, 2007). Thus more research should be conducted to bridge the intention-behaviour gap as intention is not always translated into behaviour (McEachan, Conner, Taylor, & Lawton, 2011;Webb & Sheeran, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is true both for studies exploring intention to buy and willingness to pay for fish products. In this respect, contingent valuation studies from the field of experimental economics can offer insights on how to by-pass hypothetical bias in willingness to pay (Camacho-Cuena, García-Gallego, Georgantzís, & Sabater-Grande, 2003;Lusk & Shogren, 2007). Thus more research should be conducted to bridge the intention-behaviour gap as intention is not always translated into behaviour (McEachan, Conner, Taylor, & Lawton, 2011;Webb & Sheeran, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this willingness to pay is elicited through a hypothetical question, experimental tests of this specific instrument have proved its reliability. In fact, Camacho-Cuena et al [25,26] showed that-though potential distortions may emerge compared to a real-incentive elicitation instrument-the measurement bias at an aggregate level is not significant. An alternative method consists in asking the willingness to accept a price against quality improvement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second individual trait that we examine is attendees' willingness to pay for a quality increase in the cultural good (see [23,24]). We elicit it through a hypothetical question commonly asked in the contingent valuation literature to assess the value of a non-market good (see [25][26][27]). Here, we are not interested in assessing the economic value attached to the festival by participants.…”
Section: A Simple Model Of Privatization Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, a portion of the sample did not see substantial benefits with the policy change, but the rest is willing to pay considerable amounts to keep preserving the ecosystem watershed. There have been various studies debating about which measure should be used in contingent valuation studies [34][35][36][37]. The mean is very sensitive to the right tail of the distribution; that is, to responses of higher bidders [35].…”
Section: Number Of Observations 242mentioning
confidence: 99%