2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2005.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental study on the design parameters of a counterflow vortex tube

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
62
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(31 reference statements)
6
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The design of the swirl inlet was based on the work of Aydin and Baki [36], who used a similar design for counter flow vortex tubes to compare the effect of different inlet angles on swirl flow. The design used in this study was checked for swirl intensity by using a computational fluid dynamics model before it was manufactured.…”
Section: Swirl Inletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of the swirl inlet was based on the work of Aydin and Baki [36], who used a similar design for counter flow vortex tubes to compare the effect of different inlet angles on swirl flow. The design used in this study was checked for swirl intensity by using a computational fluid dynamics model before it was manufactured.…”
Section: Swirl Inletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saidi and Valipour (Saidi & Valipour, 2003) optimized L/D ratio for best efficiency, and suggested that for achieving higher efficiency, L/D ratio should be in the range of20 ≤ ≤ 55.5 ⁄ . Aydin (Aydin & Baki, 2006) based on the experimental results suggested that L/D20, but the trend of the results obtained is exactly opposite of few researchers (Hilsch, 1947;Promvonge & Eiamsa-ard, 2005;. Cockerill (Cockerill, 1995) experimentally analysed that L/D ratio equal to 60 and 64 produces effective temperature separation.…”
Section: Effect Of L/d Ratiomentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, it is not possible to keep L/D constant and predict changes; hence, effect of change in L/D ratio becomes a useful parameter. These experimental studies (Gulyaev, 1966;Dyskin, 1989;Saidi & Allaf Yazdi, 1999;Aydin & Baki, 2006;Saidi & Valipour, 2003;Polisel, Rocha, & Simões-Moreira, 2007) Gulyaev (Gulyaev, 1966) suggested that L/D > 13 for increasing energy separation. Dyskin (Dyskin, 1989) incorporated detwister on cold end side, and proved that length of tube decreases for optimum performance using detwister.…”
Section: Effect Of L/d Ratiomentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations