1975
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197509000-00035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental Study on the Significance of Muscle Tissue Interposition on Fracture Healing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fracture instability, infection, soft tissue interposition, distraction of fracture fragments, poor vascularity, and soft tissue damage have been demonstrated to be significant factors contributing to the development of a nonunion fracture. [22][23][24][25] Several studies have demonstrated that muscle interposition into the fracture site may be an important factor in the displacement of a nonunion. 26,27 These studies lead us to hypothesize that a delayed union or nonunion may develop when there is a large amount of soft tissue interposed into the fracture site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fracture instability, infection, soft tissue interposition, distraction of fracture fragments, poor vascularity, and soft tissue damage have been demonstrated to be significant factors contributing to the development of a nonunion fracture. [22][23][24][25] Several studies have demonstrated that muscle interposition into the fracture site may be an important factor in the displacement of a nonunion. 26,27 These studies lead us to hypothesize that a delayed union or nonunion may develop when there is a large amount of soft tissue interposed into the fracture site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] The known causes of delayed or nonunion of fractures are multiple and include infection, mechanical instability, interposition of soft tissue, loss of vascularization, distraction of fragments, and extensive soft tissue damage. [4][5][6] The rate of nonunions after primary surgical treatment of humeral fractures has been reported from 0% to 29% 7,8 and in case of tibia from 8% to 10%. [9][10][11][12] Delayed or nonunions are being currently treated by plate and screw fixation, external wire fixators, or stable internal fixation in combination with bone grafting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MacroPore resorbable protective sheets enable protected bone healing without the disadvan- tages of metal, including the possible necessity of removing the implants, the difficulty associated with radiographic assessment, and the effects of stress shielding. Spontaneous healing of large bone defects, including the donor sites in the ilium, appears to be generally limited by the interposition of adjacent musculature 1,16,17 The MacroPore OS Protective Sheeting is a resorbable implant that may be used to protect bone graft sites to facilitate bone regeneration. 18 Donor sites regenerate by a process similar to endosteal fracture repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%