2003
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental study on seismic responses of multifunctional vibration‐absorption reinforced concrete megaframe structures

Abstract: SUMMARYTwo models are tested on a shake-table. One of the models is a normal reinforced concrete megaframe structure and the other is a multifunctional vibration-absorption reinforced concrete megaframe structure in which the laminated rubber bearings are placed between the major frame and the minor frames. Two earthquake motions (the El Centro wave and the Taft wave) are used during the test. This paper presents the dynamic characteristic, the seismic responses and the failure mechanism of these two models un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a system has the following advantages: (a) efficient and economic use of resources by incorporating different materials for the mega-frame and the substructures, (b) flexibility to meet special architectural or functional requirements, (c) better structural performance and integration and (d) quicker and easier construction. Although very limited theoretical and experimental research has been conducted in this area (Feng and Mita, 1995;Lan et al, 2004;Shu et al, 2005;Zhang et al, 2005;and Kim and Jung, 2013), existing research outcomes indicate that the mega-frame structure has outstanding seismic performance. Nevertheless, limited study has been conducted to investigate how to efficiently control the vibration of mega-frame structures subjected to earthquakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a system has the following advantages: (a) efficient and economic use of resources by incorporating different materials for the mega-frame and the substructures, (b) flexibility to meet special architectural or functional requirements, (c) better structural performance and integration and (d) quicker and easier construction. Although very limited theoretical and experimental research has been conducted in this area (Feng and Mita, 1995;Lan et al, 2004;Shu et al, 2005;Zhang et al, 2005;and Kim and Jung, 2013), existing research outcomes indicate that the mega-frame structure has outstanding seismic performance. Nevertheless, limited study has been conducted to investigate how to efficiently control the vibration of mega-frame structures subjected to earthquakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some studies about the optimal parameters between the substructure and megastructure have been conducted in order to achieve the best performance. Lan et al [3] proposed a multifunction mega-sub isolation structure, which has the function of the mass dampers and base isolation as well as damping energy dissipation. Qin et al [4,5] and Zhang et al [6,7] investigated the control performances of the mega-sub controlled structure with different control strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-rise building is the product of social demand, economic prosperity and technological advancement [1,2] . With the increasing complexity of functional requirements, structure form is constantly changing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%