1969
DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(69)90087-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental study of the dispersion of the emissions from chimneys in reading—III: The investigation of dispersion calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

1970
1970
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…neutral or average conditions A ~ 200 stable conditions A ~ 600 (10.101) unstable conditions A ~ 50 Marsh and Withers (1969) find that the grid size Ax which yields the best correlation between observed concentration, C , and grid averaged emissions, Q^ is about 5 km.…”
Section: Line and Area Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…neutral or average conditions A ~ 200 stable conditions A ~ 600 (10.101) unstable conditions A ~ 50 Marsh and Withers (1969) find that the grid size Ax which yields the best correlation between observed concentration, C , and grid averaged emissions, Q^ is about 5 km.…”
Section: Line and Area Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A major source of this sulphur dioxide is Greater London to the south east, including the industrial estate and power station at Slough, Buckinghamshire. Reading, with a population of 139,000 and its own power station, has moderate levels of sulphur dioxide pollution which closely follow its suburban limits (Marsh and Foster, 1967). Didcot power station has too high a stack to have much effect on local lichens, while Oxford, with a population of 128,000 and no heavy industry or power station, is not heavily polluted and Parmelia species can be found on bark and wood within its suburbs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the ratio of the standard deviation (observed-estimated) to the observed mean (a'oe/pobs in Table 10.1) is not a true statistic, in that it cannot be related by, for example, a confidence level to a random distribution of uncorrelated pairs of values, it is a ratio commonly used to evaluate the success of models. Marsh and Withers (1969) indicate that, for their Reading, England, model as well as for others in the literature, the ratios 6oe/bobs are all higher than 1.1 for 6-and 24-hr averages during the heating season. From Table 10 because the former considers a band of acceptable error, whereas the latter is based on actual calculated and observed values (e.g., if Xobs = 0.03 ppm and Xest = 0.01 ppm, the skill score considers this pair a "success," whereas, for the purposes of calculating R2, this pair represents an error of 0.02 ppm).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%