2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11440-021-01438-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental study of the active failure mechanism of narrow backfills installed behind rigid retaining walls conducted using Geo-PIV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differing from the passive mechanism, with a narrow enough space between the retaining wall and the existing structure, the reflective failure surface was not observed in the model test conducted by Rui et al 5 However, this result does not mean that there is no reflective failure surface development in the active limit state. The reflective failure surface can be observed in the model test conducted by Xu et al 48 However, the reflective development of the active failure surface only occurred in the tests conducted by Xu et al, 48 while no similar phenomenon was observed in the tests conducted by other works in the literature. This may be related to the soil properties, interface friction angle, and test conditions.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Differing from the passive mechanism, with a narrow enough space between the retaining wall and the existing structure, the reflective failure surface was not observed in the model test conducted by Rui et al 5 However, this result does not mean that there is no reflective failure surface development in the active limit state. The reflective failure surface can be observed in the model test conducted by Xu et al 48 However, the reflective development of the active failure surface only occurred in the tests conducted by Xu et al, 48 while no similar phenomenon was observed in the tests conducted by other works in the literature. This may be related to the soil properties, interface friction angle, and test conditions.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, this result does not mean that there is no reflective failure surface development in the active limit state. The reflective failure surface can be observed in the model test conducted by Xu et al 48 . However, the reflective development of the active failure surface only occurred in the tests conducted by Xu et al, 48 while no similar phenomenon was observed in the tests conducted by other works in the literature.…”
Section: Discrete Element Simulationmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, the point of maximum active earth pressure is located around the wall toe. However, this intuitionistic phenomenon does not well match with the experimental results under the RT mode reported by Deng and Haigh (2020) and Xu et al (2022). Using centrifuge tests, Deng and Haigh (2020) pointed out that the shallow layer of backfills forms a highly-stressed zone, causing the earth pressure at the top to increase with the active wall movements.…”
Section: Arching-induced Principal Stress Rotationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The roughness factor of the wall-soil interface was 0.507. More detailed parameters can refer to Xu et al (2022). On this basis, we produce a FELA numerical model to obtain the upper bound (UB) and lower bound (LB) solutions.…”
Section: Cohesionless Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%