1974
DOI: 10.1080/10417947409372244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental study of humor and ethos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, prior research on associations between humour style and perceived personality applies to teachable conversational agents as well. Similar results on an overuse of humour being perceived as distracting have previously been found [45,55], and prior work with conversational agents has investigated the timing of jokes, showing that an agent with appropriately timed humour makes the conversation more interesting than a non-humour-equipped one [16]. Future work could look at whether improving timing and amount of affiliative humour style jokes improves the learning experience when conversing with a teachable agent.…”
Section: Humorous Vs Non-humorous Teachable Agentssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Third, prior research on associations between humour style and perceived personality applies to teachable conversational agents as well. Similar results on an overuse of humour being perceived as distracting have previously been found [45,55], and prior work with conversational agents has investigated the timing of jokes, showing that an agent with appropriately timed humour makes the conversation more interesting than a non-humour-equipped one [16]. Future work could look at whether improving timing and amount of affiliative humour style jokes improves the learning experience when conversing with a teachable agent.…”
Section: Humorous Vs Non-humorous Teachable Agentssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Meyer (1990) resists the issue of defining humor, suggesting that humor cannot be detached from the context; where there is laughter there is potential for humor. Taylor (1974) < suggests that humor must be listener defined. Research by Grimes (1955a) supports the position that humor is a stimuli; receiver perception and activity Humor can contrast two incongruent ideas (Goldstein & McGee, 1972;Hudson, 1979, Meyer, 1990.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%