2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental study of cell performance and pressure drop of proton exchange membrane fuel cells with baffled flow channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the advantages of the channel design in this work is the very low pressure drop in all cases. The pressure drop in the traditional channel (DN1) is 35.62 Pa, whereas the maximum pressure drop is 31.87 Pa of DN7, which is much lower than the other flow fields, for example, 400–900 Pa at 0.4 V of the baffled channel, 24 ~1.5 × 10 4 Pa at 1.0 A cm −2 of the dead‐end channel with through‐plane array, 38 and ~ 5 × 10 4 Pa of the traditional interdigitated flow field 52 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One of the advantages of the channel design in this work is the very low pressure drop in all cases. The pressure drop in the traditional channel (DN1) is 35.62 Pa, whereas the maximum pressure drop is 31.87 Pa of DN7, which is much lower than the other flow fields, for example, 400–900 Pa at 0.4 V of the baffled channel, 24 ~1.5 × 10 4 Pa at 1.0 A cm −2 of the dead‐end channel with through‐plane array, 38 and ~ 5 × 10 4 Pa of the traditional interdigitated flow field 52 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…To maintain sufficient reactant supply, excellent water removal, and low pressure drop, various novel flow field designs have been proposed and studied 23–30 . For instance, Chen et al 23 invented a porous‐blocked baffled flow channel, in which porous blocks were installed between GDL and baffles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chen et al 85 mentioned the effects of pressure drop characteristics of baffled and straight flow channels on PEM fuel cells at various temperatures from experiments. Increasing baffles noticed the increase in net power and a 45.14% reduction in power efficiency was observed if baffles had no leeward side.…”
Section: Parameters Influencing the Performance Of Pem Fuel Cellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of critical information extraction, techniques are mainly divided into two main categories: physicochemical tests, such as pressure drop measurement, neutron imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging; electrochemical methods: such as polarization curve, current pulse injection, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) [9]. The gas pressure drop between channel inlet and outlet is an effective signal for the determination of gas transfer resistance, which is closely associated with flooding failure, but it seems that drying information cannot be obtained [10]. Neutron imaging and magnetic resonance imaging can realize internal in situ measurement but are not suitable for on-board applications due to limitations of measurement and price [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%