2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental micromechanical study of sand grain contacts behavior from different geological environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The grains are relatively smaller in size compared to DNA‐1A, and there are minor abrasions visible on their surfaces which might be due to the sediment transportation (Ghosh et al, ). Similar abrasions were also observed by Sandeep, He, et al () on the surfaces of river sand grains from Guangdong Province, China.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The grains are relatively smaller in size compared to DNA‐1A, and there are minor abrasions visible on their surfaces which might be due to the sediment transportation (Ghosh et al, ). Similar abrasions were also observed by Sandeep, He, et al () on the surfaces of river sand grains from Guangdong Province, China.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The theoretical curve as shown in Figure revealed a wide gap between MD model and the experimental tangential curves for both material types. Previous works (Nardelli et al, ; Sandeep, He, et al, ; Sandeep & Senetakis, , ) reported, similarly, mismatch between MD model and experimental results on a broad range of geological materials, when the MD model is used with its originally proposed power of 1/3 (equation ). They also reported that differences between MD model and experimental curve can be reduced to some extent by considering initial tangential stiffness derived from experiment rather than from equation .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The low surface roughness and the high surface hardness values imply a lower coefficient of friction for the material as the literature data would suggest. 49,54,57 A highly plastic clay, montmorillonite, and a non-plastic silt, composed of crushed aggregates, were used as gouge materials in this study. The montmorillonite was obtained in powder form.…”
Section: Description Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity of stick-slip instability at lower F N compared to higher F N is shown in Figure 3B in terms of mobilized friction coefficient (μ mob ), defined as the ratio of tangential force to the applied normal force at a given tangential displacement. Based on literature sources, 44,49,54 the coefficient of friction of the smooth quartz plates is smaller (μ ss = 0.10-0.15) compared to that of natural quartz grains (LBS, μ ss = 0.15-0.30), and is in the range of engineered materials such as steel balls (μ ss = 0.09) and glass balls (μ ss = 0.11), which also have smooth surfaces.…”
Section: Frictional Behavior Of Bounding Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%