An experimental measurement of contradictory judgement matrices in AHP

Gupta, Vishal; Rohil, Mukesh Kumar

doi:10.1109/pdgc.2012.6449876

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The differences in b-pinene hydrogenation yields were used to form a judgment matrix on a scale from 1-9 and the results were analyzed. 53 The consistency index of the intermediate elements (0.0202 s 0) and the consistency ratio of the ve indicators (0.0180 < 0.1) indicated that the consistency of the judgment matrix of the intermediate elements and the inter-pair sorting results were acceptable, and the weighting coefficients obtained were reasonably valid without logical confusion.…”

Section: Exploring the Hydrogenation Processmentioning

confidence: 94%

Single-factor analysis of Ni–B–AC-catalyzed β-pinene hydrogenation based on hierarchical analysis

Deng

Jiang

et al. 2022

RSC Adv.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Exploring the Hydrogenation Processmentioning

confidence: 94%

Single-factor analysis of Ni–B–AC-catalyzed β-pinene hydrogenation based on hierarchical analysis

Deng

Jiang

et al. 2022

RSC Adv.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To make it more effective, the magnitude, or intensity, of the criticisms in the judgement matrices of order 3x3 to 9x9 is measured [10]. For it an experimental analysis was conducted and large number of inconsistent matrices with consistency ratio less than 10% were generated and tested for contradictory test.…”

Section: Proposed Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It clearly shows that with both the techniques as the order of judgement matrix increases its probability of being contradictory also increases sharply. The detailed discussion about this is available in [10].…”

Section: Proposed Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Network discovery and user preferences for network selection in 3G-WLAN interworking environment

Gupta

2013

2013 Fifth International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a heterogeneous networking environment vertical handover decision plays a very crucial role in the overall handover process as wrongly selected network spoils the overall purpose of Always Best Connected (ABC). For it many decision models, based on diverse parameters and techniques, have been proposed. In this paper, following two requirements which most of such models require are emphasized: a) Network information other than that available in the corresponding network advertising frame to get the values of the decision parameters considered and b) User Preferences because it is the user satisfaction which is one of the ultimate aim of vertical handover process and different users can have different preferences on the same parameter. It is shown that how additional information can be stuffed in the Information Element's LENGTH field of 802.11 compatible beacon frame. Also, capturing user preferences is modeled primarily on the parameters derived from the fields added by IEEE 802.11u to the beacon frame. The proposed technique for it, called Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), is also made more effective by measuring its criticisms.

show abstract

Comparative Performance of Contradictory and Non-Contradictory Judgement Matrices in AHP Under Qualitative and Quantitative Metrics

Gupta

2018

International Journal of Decision Support System Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the years, although AHP has proved its success in various diverse fields, many authors in the literature have also shown its shortcomings, often called as criticisms of AHP. One such criticism is allowing the consideration of contradictory judgement matrices. Such matrices violate the principle of ordinal transitivity and thus there does not exist any ranking of corresponding decision elements which satisfy all the judgements. In this paper, the results of our investigation towards measuring this criticism are further explored and discussed by comparing the quality of priority vector of contradictory judgement matrices and non-contradictory judgement matrices under Rank Reversals and the common frame work of “aggregated deviation”. The results further strengthen the notion of contradictory judgement matrices as a strong criticism of AHP for higher order judgement matrices and necessitate some proper avoidance (if not elimination) procedure for them.

show abstract

An experimental measurement of contradictory judgement matrices in AHP

Cited by 3 publications

References 18 publications

Single-factor analysis of Ni–B–AC-catalyzed β-pinene hydrogenation based on hierarchical analysis

Single-factor analysis of Ni–B–AC-catalyzed β-pinene hydrogenation based on hierarchical analysis

Network discovery and user preferences for network selection in 3G-WLAN interworking environment

Comparative Performance of Contradictory and Non-Contradictory Judgement Matrices in AHP Under Qualitative and Quantitative Metrics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About