2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2011.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental investigation on the effect of pH variation of MWCNT–H2O nanofluid on the efficiency of a flat-plate solar collector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of direct absorption nanoparticles materials had have been analyzed in terms of the enhancement in the photothermal performance, including Ag [27][28][29], Au [30][31][32], CNT (carbon nanotubes) [33][34][35], Cu [36], Al 2 O 3 [37,38], graphite [17], graphene [22], and TiO 2 [39]. In addition to the volumetric heating, direct vapor generation due to localized heating of the As far as the steam generation mechanism is concerned, for nanobubbles to be produced around heated nanoparticles, it has been shown analytically that a minimum radiation flux of 3×10 8 W/m 2 is required to produce nanobubbles on heated nanoparticles [46,49,50], which can may only be reached developed by powerful laser beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of direct absorption nanoparticles materials had have been analyzed in terms of the enhancement in the photothermal performance, including Ag [27][28][29], Au [30][31][32], CNT (carbon nanotubes) [33][34][35], Cu [36], Al 2 O 3 [37,38], graphite [17], graphene [22], and TiO 2 [39]. In addition to the volumetric heating, direct vapor generation due to localized heating of the As far as the steam generation mechanism is concerned, for nanobubbles to be produced around heated nanoparticles, it has been shown analytically that a minimum radiation flux of 3×10 8 W/m 2 is required to produce nanobubbles on heated nanoparticles [46,49,50], which can may only be reached developed by powerful laser beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [19][20][21], ( ) and are called absorbed energy parameter and removed energy parameter respectively.…”
Section: Energy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They demonstrated that 4.34% reduction of entropy generation, 22.15% enhancement of heat transfer coefficient and 1.58% pumping power penalty when using CuO nanofluid compared to that of water. Yousefi et al [19][20][21] carried out three different experimental analyses using MWCNT-H2O and Al2O3-H2O nanofluids in a flat-plate solar collector. They pointed out that he efficiency of flat-plate solar collector increased by 28.3% using 0.2 wt% Al2O3 and 15.63% using 0.4 wt% Al2O3 with surfactant compared to water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yousefi et al [29] investigated the effect of pH of MWCNT-H2O nanofluid on the efficiency of a flat-plate solar collector as seen in Figure 16. The experiments were carried out using 0.2 wt% MWCNT (10-30 nm) with various pH values (3.5, 6.5 and 9.5) and with Triton X-100 as an additive.…”
Section: Role Of the Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choosing the right surfactant is mainly dependent on the properties of the base fluids and particles Yousefi et al [29] MWCNT/water flat plate solar collector They found that increasing or decreasing the pH with respect to the pH of the isoelectric point (IEP) would enhance the positive effect of nanofluids on the efficiency of the solar collector Sardarabadi et al [30] SiO2/water PV/T Thermal efficiency of the PV/T collector for the two cases of 1 and 3 wt% of silica/water nanofluid increased 7.6% and 12.8%, respectively.…”
Section: Using Nanofluids In Solar Pondmentioning
confidence: 99%