2008
DOI: 10.1002/stc.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental investigation of the data delivery performance of a wireless sensing unit designed for structural health monitoring

Abstract: This study explores the reliability of a wireless sensing unit by testing it in a real-world university laboratory environment. The unit employs off-the-shelf products for their key components, while a flexible payload scheme was adopted for radio packet transmission to maximize throughput and minimize latency. The testing consists of two main parts: (1) a series of loopback tests using two off-the-shelf radio components with carrier frequencies of 900 MHz and 2:4 GHz; respectively, and (2) wireless transmissi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moist and rainy conditions were also beneficial in studying the performance of the selected wireless sensor network under undesirable conditions (for wireless communication). For essentially the same testing environment, a sperate study by some of the authors shows that the foliage condition does not play a significant role (Pei et al, 2008). Therefore, trees are not indicated in Figure 4.…”
Section: Details Of Outdoor Testing Testing Environment and Configuramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moist and rainy conditions were also beneficial in studying the performance of the selected wireless sensor network under undesirable conditions (for wireless communication). For essentially the same testing environment, a sperate study by some of the authors shows that the foliage condition does not play a significant role (Pei et al, 2008). Therefore, trees are not indicated in Figure 4.…”
Section: Details Of Outdoor Testing Testing Environment and Configuramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing environment, especially the existence of building materials, the condition of traffic flow, and the weather during testing, are among the factors that affect the performance of wireless sensor networks (Shankar, 2002;Mark and Zhuang, 2003;Pei et al, 2008). As shown in Figure 4, the buildings are low-rise and sparse.…”
Section: Details Of Outdoor Testing Testing Environment and Configuramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to energy-balanced routing, reliable routing is another major concern for wireless SHM systems [21][22][23]. However, communication reliability is outside the scope of this paper; reliable data transmission is assumed in this study and the authors analyze the reliability of the system related to SHM purposes only.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimizing (25) over d and m gives d * and m * such that moving away from (d * , m * ) will result in no improvement in the mode shape error or energy consumption that will not be outweighed by the decrease in the other measure. Figure 7 The weights in (23) and (25) are used to accommodate with different units and scales of the mode shape error and the energy consumption. The relative importance of the mode shape error and the energy consumption can be varied by adjusting the weights a M and a E , which in turn will affect the optimal solutions for d * and/or m * , favoring either the accuracy in mode shape estimation or the energy efficiency.…”
Section: Location and Number Of Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the most important shortcomings of wireless SHM systems stem from the features that constitute their very benefits over cable‐based SHM systems . For example, however cost‐effective, eliminating wired connections adversely affects the reliability of data communication between wireless sensor nodes and servers . In this context, due to the absence of cables, wireless sensor nodes essentially operate as independent data acquisition units .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%