An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Stress on Saving and Acquiring Behavioral Tendencies: The Role of Distress Tolerance and Negative Urgency

Shaw, Ashley M.; Timpano, Kiara R.

doi:10.1016/j.beth.2015.10.003

Cited by 32 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As anticipated, low self-reported DT has nearly unanimously been found to be associated with higher symptoms of depression Ameral et al, 2017;Anestis et al, 2007Anestis et al, , 2012Anestis et al, , 2013Banducci, Connolly, Vujanovic, Alvarez, & Bonn-Miller, 2017;Benfer, Bardeen, & Fergus, 2017;Bernstein et al, 2009Bernstein et al, , 2011Brandt, Zvolensky, & Bonn-Miller, 2012;Brooks Holliday, Pedersen, & Leventhal, 2016;Buckner et al, 2007;Capron et al, 2013;Chasson, Bello, Luxon, Graham, & Leventhal, 2017;Cougle et al, 2011;Cougle, Timpano, & Goetz, 2012;Dennhardt & Murphy, 2011;Elhai, Levine, O'Brien, & Armour, 2018;Hashoul-Andary et al, 2015;Huang, Szabo, & Han, 2009;Iverson et al, 2012;Kelly et al, 2014;Keough, Riccardi, & J., Timpano, K. R., Mitchell, M. A., & Schmitdt, N., B., 2010;Kiselica et al, 2015;Lin, You, Wu, & Jiang, 2018;Macatee, Albanese, Allan, Schmidt, & Cougle, 2016;Magidson et al, 2013;McDermott et al, 2018;McHugh et al, 2014;Norr, Allan, Macatee, Keough, & Schmidt, 2014;O'Cleirigh, Ironson, & Smits, 2007;Peterson, Davis-Becker, & Fischer, 2014;Shaw & Timpano, 2016;Timpano et al, 2009;…”

Section: Self-report Measures Of Dtmentioning

confidence: 71%

Distress tolerance and symptoms of depression: A review and integration of literatures

Lass

Winer

2020

Clin Psychol Sci Pract

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Distress tolerance has emerged as a transdiagnostic risk factor for psychopathology but has received little theoretical attention in the depression literature. Evidence strongly suggests that individuals who have trouble tolerating distress display greater symptoms of depression, however. The lack of overlap between literatures is an important oversight, as the depression literature provides unique perspectives that have yet to be addressed in the distress tolerance literature. The current review thus (1) integrates findings from different literatures on distress tolerance and symptoms of depression, (2) discusses how this synthesis can inform clinical science and burgeoning distress tolerance treatments, (3) outlines important gaps in the distress tolerance and depression literatures, and (4) describes how they may be addressed by incorporating recent theoretical advances.

show abstract

Section: Self-report Measures Of Dtmentioning

confidence: 71%

Distress tolerance and symptoms of depression: A review and integration of literatures

Lass

Winer

2020

Clin Psychol Sci Pract

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Both Norberg et al (2015) and Shaw and Timpano (2016) found DI to predict hoarding-relevant behavior after laboratory-induced stress, but not in a neutral condition. However, these studies utilized laboratory mood induction procedures, precluding the possibility of testing DI's prospective role as a moderator of response to ecologically valid stressors.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…Few studies have explicitly tested DI's theorized role as a moderator of acute stress responding, though some empirical support has been found in recent laboratory investigations (Norberg et al, 2015; Shaw and Timpano, 2016). Both Norberg et al (2015) and Shaw and Timpano (2016) found DI to predict hoarding-relevant behavior after laboratory-induced stress, but not in a neutral condition.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Distress intolerance as a moderator of the relationship between daily stressors and affective symptoms: Tests of incremental and prospective relationships

Macatee

Albanese

Schmidt

et al. 2016

Journal of Affective Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Distress intolerance (DI) is conceptualized as an individual difference reflective of the ability to tolerate aversive psychological states. Although high DI has demonstrated cross-sectional associations with multiple forms of psychopathology, few studies have tested key facets of its theoretical conceptualization. Specifically, little research has been conducted on DI's theorized role as an incrementally valid prospective moderator of the relationship between daily stressful events and affective symptoms reflective of preoccupation with aversive internal (e.g., depression, worry) rather than external stimuli (e.g., social anxiety). Method A non-clinical sample (N = 147; 77% female; M age = 19.32) in which high DI individuals were oversampled was recruited. Participants completed baseline measures of DI and trait negative affect followed by six diary entries over a two-week period in which participants reported on daily stressors, negative affect, worry, depressive, and social anxiety symptoms. Results Hierarchical linear models revealed that DI positively predicted depressive and worry, but not social anxiety symptoms, independent of daily stressors and negative affect. Further, a significant interaction effect was found such that the positive association between daily stressor(s) occurrence and daily worry was significant at high, but not low DI, and a similar trend-level interaction effect was observed for depressive symptoms. The interaction for social anxiety symptoms was non-significant Limitations Utilization of a non-clinical sample precludes generalization of results to clinical samples. Only self-reported DI was assessed, limiting conclusions to perceived as opposed to behaviorally-indexed DI. Conclusions Results largely supported DI's theoretical conceptualization as an incrementally valid moderator of stress responding with relevance to particular affective symptoms.

show abstract

“…Collecting behavior can be conceived to fall along a continuum (Timpano et al, 2013). At one end of the continuum are individuals who expend significant resources to acquire consumer goods, while at the opposite end are those individuals who invest a minimal amount of resources to acquiring goods (Shaw & Timpano, 2016).…”

Section: Compulsive Collectingmentioning

confidence: 99%

The tripartite model of aberrant purchasing: A theory to explain the maladaptive pursuit of consumption

Harnish

Roster

2018

Psychology and Marketing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The goal of this study was to differentiate maladaptive consumer purchasing behaviors through the use of a triangular conceptual framework to understand aberrant purchasing behavior. The tripartite model of aberrant purchasing (T‐MAP) draws upon classic tripartite attitude models as a heuristic to propose how cognitive (i.e., self‐regulation), affective (i.e., pain of paying), and behavioral (i.e., acquisitiveness) components of attitudes may serve to differentiate closely related but distinctive types of consumers exhibiting aberrant purchasing behaviors, including compulsive buyers, compulsive collectors, frugalists, and materialists. Methods Data were obtained from 500 respondents (n = 495 complete and eligible) recruited through Prolific Academic who participated in an Internet survey created and hosted on the Qualtrics survey platform. Measures for assessing the three triangular aspects of the T‐MAP, self‐regulation, pain of paying, and acquisitiveness, along with the four aberrant purchasing behaviors, compulsive buying, compulsive collecting, frugality, and materialism, were measured. Hypotheses were posited for each of the aberrant purchasing behaviors based on distinctive combinations of the three attitudinal components. Results All four study hypotheses were supported by discriminant function analysis. Compulsive buyers exhibited lower levels of pain of paying and lower levels of self‐regulation than noncompulsive buyers. Compulsive collectors scored higher on both pain of paying and acquisitiveness than noncollectors. Frugalists exhibited high levels of self‐regulation coupled with low acquisitiveness. Materialists scored low on both self‐regulation and pain of paying but scored high on acquisitiveness. Conclusions Collectively, the T‐MAP model differentiates various aberrant consumer purchasing behaviors that have been identified, but yet to be fully distinguished in the consumer literature.

show abstract

An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Stress on Saving and Acquiring Behavioral Tendencies: The Role of Distress Tolerance and Negative Urgency

Cited by 32 publications

References 56 publications

Distress tolerance and symptoms of depression: A review and integration of literatures

Distress tolerance and symptoms of depression: A review and integration of literatures

Distress intolerance as a moderator of the relationship between daily stressors and affective symptoms: Tests of incremental and prospective relationships

The tripartite model of aberrant purchasing: A theory to explain the maladaptive pursuit of consumption

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About