1989
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4573(89)90026-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental investigation of the effects of some information system design variables on performance, preference, and learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, four alternative theories (generally new to information systems), namely self-justification theory, prospect theory, agency theory, and approach-avoidance theory, are offered as alternatives to simple escalation behavior, to understand the dynamics of commitment to software projects. Following other studies in information systems (e.g., Liberatore et al 1989), a logistic regression methodology is employed to compare the explanatory power of the four theories for the commitment to a software project.…”
Section: Two Degrees Of Freedom Research Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, four alternative theories (generally new to information systems), namely self-justification theory, prospect theory, agency theory, and approach-avoidance theory, are offered as alternatives to simple escalation behavior, to understand the dynamics of commitment to software projects. Following other studies in information systems (e.g., Liberatore et al 1989), a logistic regression methodology is employed to compare the explanatory power of the four theories for the commitment to a software project.…”
Section: Two Degrees Of Freedom Research Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experience, however, is the only individual cognitive difference that is consistently significant when assessing information system use (Nilan & Newby, 199 1;Carroll & Maxwell, 1979). Experience is measured as number of repetitions, duration, previous exposure, and so forth (e.g., Liberatore, Titus, Varano, & Dixon, 1989;Egan, 1988;Borgman, 1986). HIP research also recognizes that a given ability does not guarantee equivalent success on all tasks, even after accounting for individual differences.…”
Section: System 3 View Of User: User Competencementioning
confidence: 99%