2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.09.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental investigation of evaporation time and the relative humidity on a novel positively charged ultrafiltration membrane via dry–wet phase inversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(25 reference statements)
3
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This morphology causes smaller membrane flux, while rejection will increase. These results have been confirmed with previous researchers [10][11]. Therefore, for further investigation needs to be conducted to obtain the optimum evaporation time which produces an excelent membrane separation performance.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This morphology causes smaller membrane flux, while rejection will increase. These results have been confirmed with previous researchers [10][11]. Therefore, for further investigation needs to be conducted to obtain the optimum evaporation time which produces an excelent membrane separation performance.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is because during evaporation of solvent, the polymer concentration in the surface layer increased which will form a dense surface. Moreover, this layer will inhibit the speed of solvent exchange with non-solvent through a membrane sub-layer during coagulation processes and produced a smaller pore size and ultimately will reduce the flux [11]. That the longer of evaporation time can also increase the active layer thickness of the membrane.…”
Section: Effect Of Solvent Evaporation Time On the Performance Of Ca mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The degree of bromination was controlled by adding a given amount of bromine while the substitution position (benzyl or aryl) was controlled by the temperature [20]. The final solution was precipitated with methanol, washed by deionized water, and dried at 60 • C for at least 20 h to obtain the brominated polymer.…”
Section: Brominationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the skin layer also influenced the subsequent phase inversion process of sublayers during membrane formation, which then influence the final membrane structure and performance. 43 Figure 2 shows the SEM micrographs of the resultant membranes; M1−M6 are presented with 50 000× magnified image inset in the 5000× magnified image; however, the 5000× magnified image was inset into the 1000× magnified image for M7−M9 because of the higher pore size. All membranes showed open porous structure with crystals in the surface, which presented a similar microstructure as the lotus leaf (for M1−M6) and the electrospun nanofiber membrane (for M7− M9), because PVDF-CTFE has a higher crystallization tendency as confirmed in our previous work.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%