1902
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.44658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental inquiry regarding the nutritive value of alcohol / by W.O. Atwater and F.G. Benedict.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1920
1920
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculations used to estimate ME is a point of contention among pet food manufacturers, especially those of high digestibility. For human foods, the Atwater factors of 4, 9, and 4 kcal/g for digestible carbohydrate, fat, and protein, respectively, are commonly used to estimate ME ( Atwater, 1902 ). Those factors were calculated using estimated digestibility coefficients of 96% for fat and carbohydrate and 91% for protein ( Harris, 1966 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculations used to estimate ME is a point of contention among pet food manufacturers, especially those of high digestibility. For human foods, the Atwater factors of 4, 9, and 4 kcal/g for digestible carbohydrate, fat, and protein, respectively, are commonly used to estimate ME ( Atwater, 1902 ). Those factors were calculated using estimated digestibility coefficients of 96% for fat and carbohydrate and 91% for protein ( Harris, 1966 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare against TMEn data, ME estimates were performed according to modified NRC (2006) calculations [using TDF instead of crude fiber (CF) values], Atwater factors ( Atwater, 1902 ), and modified Atwater factors. Modified nitrogen-free extract (NFE) values (using TDF instead of CF values) and ME were calculated using the following equations:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to add an additional commentary on the methodology we use at present with diet (food) analyses. Despite the considerable difficulties, assumptions and techniques available, the classical study of Atwater [ 172 ] remains the “current” basis for our energy intake/expenditure calculations. In 12 decades, science has changed considerably, and precision is one of the critical points for accepting such widely used data.…”
Section: Reserves a Highly Reserved Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routine ME measurements are not practical or financially feasible [ 7 ]; therefore, generally accepted Atwater equations are used to predict ME values and develop feeding guidelines. These equations assign coefficients for the 3 macronutrients: protein, carbohydrate (measured as N-free extract (NFE)), and fat, and exist as traditional [ 8 ] and modified [ 9 ]: Traditional ME (kcal/kg) = [4 × CP (%) + 4 × NFE (%) + 9 × crude fat (%)] × 10 Modified ME (kcal/kg) = [3.5 × CP (%) + 3.5 × NFE (%) + 8.5 × crude fat (%)] × 10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%