Day 1 Wed, June 24, 2020 2020
DOI: 10.2118/200677-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental Determination of Hydrogen Sulfide Scavenging Capacities and Mechanisms in Iron-Bearing Minerals

Abstract: The injection of sea water for the pressure support of oil fields is commonly associated with the biogeneration of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) by sulfate reducing bacteria and/or archaea (SRB/SRA). H2S is extremely toxic and corrosive, as well as providing a source of sulfide ions for the formation of iron, zinc and/or lead sulfide scale. However, H2S production is rarely, if ever, associated with seawater breakthrough and its retardation can be linked to a number of mechanisms. Certain minerals (e.g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because Fe 2+ (aq) concentrations fell stoichiometrically with sulfide and pH remained relatively constant after several sulfide spikes, immobilization appeared to occur primarily through precipitation of FeS in solution (eq ). There seemed to be a limit on sulfide immobilization capacity that was not defined by thermodynamic arguments but rather by the amount of Fe 2+ that was in solution before sulfide was first introduced …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because Fe 2+ (aq) concentrations fell stoichiometrically with sulfide and pH remained relatively constant after several sulfide spikes, immobilization appeared to occur primarily through precipitation of FeS in solution (eq ). There seemed to be a limit on sulfide immobilization capacity that was not defined by thermodynamic arguments but rather by the amount of Fe 2+ that was in solution before sulfide was first introduced …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There seemed to be a limit on sulfide immobilization capacity that was not defined by thermodynamic arguments but rather by the amount of Fe 2+ that was in solution before sulfide was first introduced. 89 Modeling Results. The reactor chemistry was modeled using Visual MINTEQ to compare experimental results to thermodynamic expectations (Figure S2).…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%