Hypersonic Flows for Reentry Problems 1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-76527-8_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental Contribution to the Flat Plate 2D Compression Ramp, Shock/Boundary Layer Interaction Problem at Mach 14 : Test Case 3.7

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Test case 2 For the second test case of $2.3, originally presented at the Hypersonic Workshop at Antibes (Desideri et al 1991), the flow was initially assumed to be fully laminar. The calculations, however, exhibited heat transfer distributions on the ramp surface after reattachment that were too low compared with the measurements provided by Simeonides & Wendt (1990). Upon further examination of the data (on the basis of the criteria discussed in $3.2), it was realized that the increase in Reynolds number relative to test case 1 caused the onset of transition to move upstream close to the reattachment point ($53.1, 3.2).…”
Section: 3)mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Test case 2 For the second test case of $2.3, originally presented at the Hypersonic Workshop at Antibes (Desideri et al 1991), the flow was initially assumed to be fully laminar. The calculations, however, exhibited heat transfer distributions on the ramp surface after reattachment that were too low compared with the measurements provided by Simeonides & Wendt (1990). Upon further examination of the data (on the basis of the criteria discussed in $3.2), it was realized that the increase in Reynolds number relative to test case 1 caused the onset of transition to move upstream close to the reattachment point ($53.1, 3.2).…”
Section: 3)mentioning
confidence: 88%