1996
DOI: 10.1109/34.506791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental comparison of range image segmentation algorithms

Abstract: A methodology for {evaluating range image segmentation algorithms is proposed. This methodology involves 1) a common set of 40 laser range finder images and 40 structured light scanner images that have manually specified ground truth and 2) a set of defined performance metrics for instances of correctly segmented, missed, and noise regions, over-and undersegmentation, and accuracy of the recovered geometry. A tool is used to objectively-compare a machine generated segmentation against the specified ground trut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
481
1
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 648 publications
(496 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
481
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…For a literature review of pose determination using range data see Greenspan [31]. Hoover et al [38] did an experimental comparison of range image segmentation algorithms up to 1996. For a discussion on recognizing 3D objects using surface descriptions see Fan et al [23], Liang and Todhunter [59], Huttenlocher and Ullman [43], Wurster et al [88], Johnson, et al [46], Caelli et al [13], Zhang and Hebert [89], Johnson and Hebert [47].…”
Section: Object Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a literature review of pose determination using range data see Greenspan [31]. Hoover et al [38] did an experimental comparison of range image segmentation algorithms up to 1996. For a discussion on recognizing 3D objects using surface descriptions see Fan et al [23], Liang and Todhunter [59], Huttenlocher and Ullman [43], Wurster et al [88], Johnson, et al [46], Caelli et al [13], Zhang and Hebert [89], Johnson and Hebert [47].…”
Section: Object Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that evaluating segmentation results and comparing segmentation algorithms are not simple tasks [4,[36][37][38][39]. However, one of the most widely used criteria for performance evaluation is whether the system can outline the desired or important regions in the image.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Segmentation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that interactions between agents provide an alternative way for image segmentation to that of approaches based on complicated and costly models. Extensive experiments have been performed using real images from the ABW database [5]. The obtained results show the high potential of the proposed approach for an efficient and accurate segmentation of range images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Region classification is performed according to a compare tool tolerance T ; 50% < T ≤ 100%, which reflects the strictness of the classification. In our case, four methods, namely USF, WSU, UB and UE, cited in [5] are involved in the comparison.…”
Section: Experimentation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation