2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental comparison of multi-frequency and chirp excitations for eddy current testing on thin defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(60 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A SL1260 impedance analyzer working in a swept frequency mode was used to acquire the multifrequency data in this paper. However, multifrequency impedances can also be abstracted simultaneously using composite multisine waveform excitation as in [23] or [34], which may improve the acquisition speed and calculation burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A SL1260 impedance analyzer working in a swept frequency mode was used to acquire the multifrequency data in this paper. However, multifrequency impedances can also be abstracted simultaneously using composite multisine waveform excitation as in [23] or [34], which may improve the acquisition speed and calculation burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to estimate the depth of defects, GMR-multifrequency approach can be used [8] and for improving signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), a chirp application can be helpful [9]. Another excitation method is the so-called pulsed eddy current method (PEC) which is widely used in conventional ET.…”
Section: Eddy Current Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-frequency EC testing [8] was proposed to detect defects in different depths, and pulse current exciting current [9] was proposed to enrich the frequency component. Chirp excitation [10], whose frequency changes with time, was used for frequency sweep. In short, the innovations in exciting current waveforms only improved the eddy current distribution over time at a certain position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%