2009
DOI: 10.1109/tlt.2009.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental Assessment of the Use of Cognitive and Affective Factors in Adaptive Educational Hypermedia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus on the cognitive (and not the emotionality) aspects of test anxiety was driven by Hembree's (1988) meta-analysis and relevant research, demonstrating that the cognitive dimension (i.e., "worry") was the component of test anxiety that had the greatest negative impact on performance. The CTAS has been validated and used as a selfreport instrument in various settings, including the United States (e.g., Bourne, Arend, Johnson, Daher, & Martin, 2006;Cassady, 2004aCassady, , 2004bRamirez & Beilock, 2011), Great Britain (Kapetanaki, 2010;Putwain & Daniels, 2010), and Greece (Tsianos, Lekkas, Germanakos, Mourlas, & Samaras, 2009). Translation of the scale into Chinese (Chen, 2007;Zheng, 2010), Arabic for use in Kuwait (Cassady, Mohammed, & Mathieu, 2004), and Spanish for native Argentinians (Furlan, Cassady, & Perez, 2009) demonstrated that the scale was also valid across cultural contexts and useful for examining cross-cultural patterns of test anxiety.…”
Section: Assessment Of Ctamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The focus on the cognitive (and not the emotionality) aspects of test anxiety was driven by Hembree's (1988) meta-analysis and relevant research, demonstrating that the cognitive dimension (i.e., "worry") was the component of test anxiety that had the greatest negative impact on performance. The CTAS has been validated and used as a selfreport instrument in various settings, including the United States (e.g., Bourne, Arend, Johnson, Daher, & Martin, 2006;Cassady, 2004aCassady, , 2004bRamirez & Beilock, 2011), Great Britain (Kapetanaki, 2010;Putwain & Daniels, 2010), and Greece (Tsianos, Lekkas, Germanakos, Mourlas, & Samaras, 2009). Translation of the scale into Chinese (Chen, 2007;Zheng, 2010), Arabic for use in Kuwait (Cassady, Mohammed, & Mathieu, 2004), and Spanish for native Argentinians (Furlan, Cassady, & Perez, 2009) demonstrated that the scale was also valid across cultural contexts and useful for examining cross-cultural patterns of test anxiety.…”
Section: Assessment Of Ctamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leading research in the field has been historically developed in research programs from Germany, England, the Netherlands, and the United States. As mentioned before, progress with CTA research has been made, with cross-cultural validation work occurring in North and South America (Furlan et al, 2009), Europe (Putwain & Daniels, 2010;Tsianos et al, 2009), Asia (Chen, 2007;Zheng, 2010), and the Middle East (Cassady et al, 2004). While this international attention is vibrant and engaging, there is a growing awareness of the need to expand research to include explicit attention to the conditions of underrepresented cultural and ethnic groups.…”
Section: Present Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infrared monitor eye gaze tracking Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), which is limited by restrictions of user's head movement and frequent calibrations etc, is an important HCI method (Cheng et al, 2010, Hansen andQiang, 2010). This method measuring the effect of personalization could be the relationship of users' actual behaviour in a hypermedia environment with theories that raise the issue of individual preferences and differences (Tsianos et al, 2009). The notion that there are individual differences in eye movement behaviour in information processing has already been supported at a cultural level (Rayner et al, 2007), at the level of gender differences (Mueller et al, 2008), and even in relation to cognitive style (verbal-analytic versus spatial-holistic) (Galin and Ornstein, 1974).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eye gaze movement and mouse moving pattern have shown impact on the Input and Understanding dimension. Tsianos et al [5] analyzed that eye gaze movement on certain document shows if someone prefers images or text while looking at documents. Similar to eye gaze tracking, Spada et al [6] are evaluating mouse movement patterns.…”
Section: A Learning Style Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%