1986
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental Approach to Language Training in Second Language Acquisition: Focus on Negation

Abstract: The effect of negation training in a second language on the expression of negation in the native language was investigated. Four-year-old children from bilingual (Spanish/English) homes who showed no expressive or receptive ability in Psychologists and educators have become concerned with the educational implications of learning more than one language during the developmental years. One critical issue in early childhood second language research is that of language transfer (Saville, 1971). If transfer effect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research conducted within the field of behavior analysis has demonstrated the importance of environmental variables in teaching a second language (Davis & O'Neill, 2004;Madrid & Torres, 1986;Petursdottir & Hafli2adó2ttir, 2009;Petursdottir, Ó lafsdóttir, & Aradóttir, 2008;Shimamune & Smith, 1995); including use of the instructional paradigm referred to as stimulus equivalence (Joyce & Joyce, 1993;Polson, Grabavac, & Parsons, 1997;Polson & Parsons, 2000). Despite the handful of applications conducted within this area of research, there is a need for further investigations to determine how emergent foreign language repertoires may be established when these skills are not acquired via traditional training techniques (i.e., matchto-sample).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research conducted within the field of behavior analysis has demonstrated the importance of environmental variables in teaching a second language (Davis & O'Neill, 2004;Madrid & Torres, 1986;Petursdottir & Hafli2adó2ttir, 2009;Petursdottir, Ó lafsdóttir, & Aradóttir, 2008;Shimamune & Smith, 1995); including use of the instructional paradigm referred to as stimulus equivalence (Joyce & Joyce, 1993;Polson, Grabavac, & Parsons, 1997;Polson & Parsons, 2000). Despite the handful of applications conducted within this area of research, there is a need for further investigations to determine how emergent foreign language repertoires may be established when these skills are not acquired via traditional training techniques (i.e., matchto-sample).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it rejects Namibian languages' dynamic nature and creates a monolingual identity for learners and, subsequently, the Namibian society by silencing the bilingual and multilingual voices (Blackledge & Creese, 2017;Creese & Blackledge, 2010;Makoe & Mckinney, 2014;Mckinney & Tyler, 2019). Thus, the English monolingualism policy substantially has affected the Namibian education system, with effects that have manifested in poor academic results (Brock-Utne & Kofi, 2005;Frydman, 2011;Madrid & Torres, 1986;Peña et al, 2011). What makes this scenario worse is the fact that several Namibian teachers seem to equally have inadequate competencies in the English language due to a lack of adequate training (Altinyelken, 2010;Cantoni, 2007;Ola-Busari, 2014).…”
Section: Language Policy Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%