Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1080/19386362.2019.1651029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental and numerical investigation of reinforced slope using geotextile encased stone column

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Liu et al [80] reported improvements in the stiffness of granitic residual soils, whereas other scholars have reported a decrease in strength [150], suggesting a variation in the behaviour of soils at different wetting and drying cycles. Additionally, detailed presentation on the preparation of cohesive beds, particularly on studies involving slope instability of embankments, is lacking, as evidenced elsewhere [151][152][153]. It is necessary that in such studies, the preparation of cohesive beds (stiff or soft) needs to be clarified, particularly where reinforcements or foundations are embedded into the slope.…”
Section: Applications Of Physical Model Tests In Slope Stability Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Liu et al [80] reported improvements in the stiffness of granitic residual soils, whereas other scholars have reported a decrease in strength [150], suggesting a variation in the behaviour of soils at different wetting and drying cycles. Additionally, detailed presentation on the preparation of cohesive beds, particularly on studies involving slope instability of embankments, is lacking, as evidenced elsewhere [151][152][153]. It is necessary that in such studies, the preparation of cohesive beds (stiff or soft) needs to be clarified, particularly where reinforcements or foundations are embedded into the slope.…”
Section: Applications Of Physical Model Tests In Slope Stability Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies using Geostudio include [12,57]. Rajabian and Viswanadham [90] used SLIDE software to supplement results obtained from centrifuge tests CM FDM Nasiri and Hajiazizi [153] investigated the performance of geotextile-encased stone columns on sandy embankments using the finite difference method. Likewise, centrifuge tests and FLAC 2D simulation were used to investigate the amplification effects and deformation conditions in a dormant loess-mudstone landslide [176].…”
Section: Numerical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, they confirmed that the performance of piles carrying loads is related to time. Nasiri and Hajiazizi [12] discovered through experiments and the three-dimensional finite difference method that, compared to ordinary gravel piles, geo-encasement stone column increased the bearing capacity of slopes by 1.66 times and improved slope stability by 65.63%, also enhancing the safety factor. At the same time, it was found that while geo-encasement stone column increased the capacity to withstand bending failure, they did not significantly change the capacity to withstand shear failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%