1956
DOI: 10.1002/jez.1401320303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental analysis of the development of the spinal column. V. Reactivity of chick somites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
23
1
1

Year Published

1957
1957
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…What is defective in the younger cells? As "determination" of the cartilage in terms of classic embryology occurs at arround the st. 20, a far earlier stage than that of the present experimental material (AVERY et al, 1956), the present results cannot be discussed in relation with the embryonic inductive interaction. Actually the present results show that differentiative traits as the cartilage are expressed with a high percentage in thus obtained colonies from earlier cells.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…What is defective in the younger cells? As "determination" of the cartilage in terms of classic embryology occurs at arround the st. 20, a far earlier stage than that of the present experimental material (AVERY et al, 1956), the present results cannot be discussed in relation with the embryonic inductive interaction. Actually the present results show that differentiative traits as the cartilage are expressed with a high percentage in thus obtained colonies from earlier cells.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The various cell fates within the somite are plastic and appear to depend on signals from surrounding tissues. In particular, dorsally generated derivatives such as muscle require signals from either the dorsal neural tube or surface ectoderm (Avery et al 1956;Vivarelli and Cossu 1986;Kenny-Mobbs and Thorogood 1987;Rong et al 1992;Buffinger and Stockdale 1994;Fan and Tessier-Lavigne 1994;Buffinger and Stockdale 1995;Cossu et al 1995;Gamel et al 1995;Mü nsterberg et al 1995;Spence et al 1996;Dietrich et al 1997), whereas the ventrally situated sclerotome is generated in response to a common signal from the floor plate and notochord (Holtzer and Detwiler 1953;Watterson et al 1954;Grobstein and Holtzer 1955;Hall 1977;Brand-Saberi et al 1993;Dietrich et al 1993Dietrich et al , 1997Goulding et al 1993;Koseki et al 1993;Pourquié et al 1993;Ebensperger et al 1995). The dorsal and ventral signals appear to be antagonistic: embryos genetically or surgically manipulated to lack both floor plate and notochord show a ventral expansion of the domain of dermomyotomal gene expression and a subsequent absence of sclerotome and vertebrae (Watterson et al 1954;Dietrich et al 1993Dietrich et al , 1997Goulding et al 1993;Monsoro-Burq et al 1994;Ebensperger et al 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the course of vertebral development, expression of the early sclerotome marker and Shh target gene Pax-1 is lost in sclerotomal cells that move dorsally to give rise to the neural arches and is eventually shut off in all differentiating chondrocytes (Deutsch et al 1988;Ebensperger et al 1995;Peters et al 1995), suggesting that Shh signals may be received only transiently by these cells. Furthermore, whereas psm and somites isolated from young chick embryos will not differentiate into chondrocytes in the absence of cocultured ventral midline tissues, these paraxial mesodermal tissues isolated from progressively older chick embryos display an increasing capacity to form cartilage when cultured in the absence of notochord and floor plate (Watterson et al 1954;Avery et al 1956;Ellison et al 1969). Taken together, these studies suggest that there are at least two distinct phases in the formation of vertebral cartilage: Shh-dependent formation of sclerotome, and the subsequent differentiation of this tissue into chondrocytes, which can occur in the absence of maintained Shh signals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the observations described above, several studies (35)(36)(37)(38)(39) have indicated that nerve tissue exerts a "trophic" influence on the initial differentiation of myogenic cells. In chorioallantoic grafting experiments, Avery et al (35) found that spinal cord tissue exerts a profound influence on the initial differentiation of myogenic cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In chorioallantoic grafting experiments, Avery et al (35) found that spinal cord tissue exerts a profound influence on the initial differentiation of myogenic cells. The presence of spinal cord also accelerates the growth and differentiation of myogenic cells in culture (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%