1993
DOI: 10.1515/humr.1993.6.3.299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experiential exploration of why men and women laugh

Abstract: Few studies have dealt with differences between the sexes in their appreciation ofjokes. This study attempts to investigate this aspect ofjokes. Nine jokes were told throughout the academic quarter in a class on Scandinavian folklore. Some jokes were longer and anecdotal, some short, two-line, Comeback type jokes, and some were sexual, some parental, and some ethnic. The students were asked to rate the jokes on a scale of l to 7 and t ifthey so wished, comment on why they thought ajoke was funny or not. Nearly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, men obtained a significantly higher score on ethical attitude toward ethnic humor than women showing that they are less critical toward ethnic jokes. The findings of this research are in concordance with a study by Lundell (1993), which indicates that men are more likely to enjoy dirty jokes than women. This can be related to Ekehammar et al, (2003) who argued that women seem to express implicit prejudice and men explicit prejudice terms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…On average, men obtained a significantly higher score on ethical attitude toward ethnic humor than women showing that they are less critical toward ethnic jokes. The findings of this research are in concordance with a study by Lundell (1993), which indicates that men are more likely to enjoy dirty jokes than women. This can be related to Ekehammar et al, (2003) who argued that women seem to express implicit prejudice and men explicit prejudice terms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, the literature on humor appreciation is less clear, probably because the type of humor concerned is a critical variable (e.g. Crawford 1995;Lundell 1993). Herzog and Kasafa (1998) found that men gave higher ratings to sick and tendentious jokes than women, while there was no gender difference found for non-tendentious jokes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies give some reason for qualifying these older patterns, however. Some researchers point out that both much of the research on gender differences in humor production and appreciation has been based on a male mode of humor-jokes that are often hostile or sexual in content (see reviews by Crawford 1995;and Lundell 1993). If so, researchers are not the only ones guilty of this bias.…”
Section: Evidence About Participation In Humor Who Jokes?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, gender has been a favorite topic. Some research suggests that women generally undervalue humor, as compared to men (Chupchick & Leventhal 1974;McGhee 1971McGhee , 1979, while more recent studies suggest that women are generally more appreciative (Lundell 1993). Recent research also suggests that men and women may appreciate different kinds of humor (Crawford 1995;Lundell 1993;Mundorf et al 1988).…”
Section: Who Laughs?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation