2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/fie43999.2019.9028508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experience with peer assessment in the context of a Computer Systems course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further peer assessment frameworks such as PRAISE (Peer Review Assignments Increase Student Experience), Peer Scholar, Peerwise, are also discussed by their studies to give more support to the peer assessment process. Oral presentation, portfolios, articles, test performances, online discussions, quizzes, etc., are the most common products observed during the survey that are assessed using peer assessment approach [53,54]. Mixed methods survey has been conducted which shows positive and significant relationship between teachers' assessment and peer assessment by using the scoring rubric to collect data for the study [24].…”
Section: Peer Assessment Peer Assessment Has Been Graduallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further peer assessment frameworks such as PRAISE (Peer Review Assignments Increase Student Experience), Peer Scholar, Peerwise, are also discussed by their studies to give more support to the peer assessment process. Oral presentation, portfolios, articles, test performances, online discussions, quizzes, etc., are the most common products observed during the survey that are assessed using peer assessment approach [53,54]. Mixed methods survey has been conducted which shows positive and significant relationship between teachers' assessment and peer assessment by using the scoring rubric to collect data for the study [24].…”
Section: Peer Assessment Peer Assessment Has Been Graduallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also helps improve learning through the refinement of programs. Evaluation takes a lot of time for teachers; thus, an alternative is to use peer evaluation, in which students evaluate their peers guided by the teacher (Montagner, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This questionnaire gives students the opportunity to reflect on their own solutions, not only analyzing the solutions of their peers. Validity was also measured using the correlation between the teacher's qualifications and those given by the students, obtaining r = 0.87, which indicates high validity (Montagner, 2019). In their research, Lee et al (2020) adapted the Quality Matters rubric, which generated the Academic Support rubric, and conducted a study on the internal consistency and reliability of a rubric.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%