2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2010.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experience curve-based decision support model for prioritizing restoration needs of cultural heritage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four design concepts and eight criteria were considered. Kim et al [25] applied SAHP and knowledge-based experience curve (EC) to rank restoration needs. AHP and SAHP are compared for ordering restoration needs of cultural heritage.…”
Section: Stochastic Ahp and Anp Methods And Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four design concepts and eight criteria were considered. Kim et al [25] applied SAHP and knowledge-based experience curve (EC) to rank restoration needs. AHP and SAHP are compared for ordering restoration needs of cultural heritage.…”
Section: Stochastic Ahp and Anp Methods And Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another crucial issue is linked to Cultural Heritage conservation. The aim here, is to make reliable diagnosis to help the restoration decision (Kim et al 2010;Cacciotti et al 2015). This implies a multidisciplinary interpretation and a comprehensive knowledge based system in which modelling and predicting alteration processes are crucial steps.…”
Section: Analyses At Nanometer Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another specific problem faced with multi-criteria techniques relates to the evaluation of the priority of the intervention between several buildings, with reference to both restoration and/or requalification [29][30][31][32] and seismic improvement interventions [33]. With regard to ecclesiastical buildings, Sangiorgio et al [34] used AHP analysis to define an exposure index linked to the artistic and architectural value, to be integrated in the vulnerability assessment.…”
Section: Applications Of Multi-criteria Analysis To Interventions On mentioning
confidence: 99%